Discussions about Jasmy’s partnerships frequently mix confirmed commercial relationships with technology integrations, historical pilot projects and unsupported speculation. Names such as Apple, Sony and Toyota are often presented as direct Jasmy partners without sufficient evidence of an agreement with the specific corporate entity being named. The publicly documented picture is still substantial. Jasmy has developed a corporate network spanning IoT infrastructure, digital identity, workplace security, healthcare, carbon credits, sport, cross-chain technology and digital-asset liquidity. These relationships are at different stages. Some involve launched services, others involve technical integrations, and others remain development projects or historical collaborations. Panasonic Advanced Technology Panasonic Advanced Technology is one of Jasmy’s most clearly documented industrial collaborators. According to Panasonic Advanced Technology’s subsequent announcements, collaboration began in February 2024. The companies publicly announced their work on 26 March 2024, combining Panasonic Advanced Technology’s IoT expertise with Jasmy’s Personal Data Locker technology. The platform is intended to connect information generated by people with information generated by devices while allowing users to control how their data is managed and shared. On 30 September 2025, the companies reported their first development results, including: software development kits supporting access to PDL development of the Jasmy Base application management of time-series IoT data My Number card-based identity verification functionality for delegating permissions over data potential applications involving connected devices and personal information The relationship expanded again on 31 August 2026 when Panasonic Advanced Technology, Jasmy and JasmyLab announced work towards Smart Render by JANCTION. Smart Render distributes rendering tasks across multiple GPU resources to accelerate animation and 3D-production workloads. In an internal performance test, a specific high-load Blender animation was rendered across 12 nodes in approximately 15 minutes, compared with approximately four hours and ten minutes using the single-GPU baseline. This represented a reported reduction in rendering time of approximately 94%. The result applies to that test configuration and should not be interpreted as a guaranteed improvement for every workload. The collaboration has produced reported technical results and progressed towards proposed commercial applications. However, the August announcement alone does not establish the number of paying customers or revenue generated. Read Panasonic’s September 2025 development report Read Panasonic’s August 2026 Smart Render announcement Aplix Corporation Jasmy and Aplix entered a formal business alliance on 4 December 2023, following earlier joint research and development. The relationship subsequently moved into implementation through the Sagan Tosu supporter application. On 1 September 2025, Aplix and Jasmy announced services connecting supporter engagement, premium digital vouchers, participating merchants and regional economic activity. Aplix launched Sagatsu! Money, an electronic-money service associated with the supporter application. The specific Sagatsu! Money 2025 campaign was scheduled to run from September 2025 until the end of February 2026. That campaign should therefore be described historically unless an extension or successor programme is confirmed. The partnership demonstrates how Jasmy’s technology can support applications combining payments, rewards and community participation. The prepaid-payment service should not be confused with a stablecoin. Its existence does not establish that Aplix or Jasmy has permission to issue a redeemable yen stablecoin. Read the September 2025 announcement Read Aplix’s service announcement Sagan Dreams and Sagan Tosu Jasmy has a documented relationship with Sagan Dreams, the company operating the professional football club Sagan Tosu. Jasmy’s sponsorship and supporter application have provided a consumer-facing setting for digital engagement and regional-commerce initiatives. Announced activities have included: official supporter fan tokens supporter participation and reward campaigns match-related promotions application-based supporter benefits merchant-linked digital vouchers the Sagatsu! Money 2025 campaign These activities span different campaigns and periods. They should not all be assumed to remain available simultaneously in 2026. The supporter fan token should also be distinguished from JASMY itself. The September 2025 announcement describes a supporter passport purchased within the application, with proceeds supporting the team and fan development. Sagan Tosu provides an example of Jasmy technology being applied to consumer services. Public announcements establish the initiatives, but do not by themselves establish their current user numbers, transaction volumes or profitability. Read the supporter-service announcement Cybertrust Japan Cybertrust Japan provides an important component of Jasmy’s ecosystem: digital identity verification. On 16 November 2023, Cybertrust and Jasmy announced integration between the iTrust Identity Verification Service and Jasmy Personal Data Locker. The integration enables identity verification using electronic certificates stored on My Number cards through Japan’s Public Personal Authentication Service. This allows applications using PDL to incorporate recognised identity-verification infrastructure without every participating business having to develop its own system. The announcement specifically identifies regional currencies and points services as anticipated applications. Other potential uses could include: membership services requiring verified identity authenticated personal-data sharing services requiring confirmation of personal attributes applications in regulated sectors, subject to their specific requirements These are potential applications, rather than evidence that each sector has adopted the integration. Jasmy is not the operator of Japan’s My Number system. It provides a data platform that integrates with Cybertrust’s identity-verification service. Read the Cybertrust announcement Novacellum and Biomedica Solution Jasmy is collaborating with Novacellum, known in Japanese as ノバセラム, and Biomedica Solution through the My Genome Guard project. The project combines genomic analysis, personal information and Jasmy’s data-management technology. Its objectives include supporting preventive and personalised medicine while managing sensitive genomic information. Novacellum is developing CTC neoantigen dendritic-cell therapy. Biomedica Solution contributes expertise including neoantigen peptide manufacture, while Jasmy provides its Web3 platform and Personal Data Locker technology. Novacellum published a further announcement on 24 April 2026 stating that the three-company project had entered full-scale implementation during that financial year. This project illustrates a potential application for user-controlled data. Genomic information is enduring, highly personal and medically valuable. Protecting it requires appropriate consent, access controls and ongoing information governance. The collaboration should not be interpreted as proof of clinical effectiveness, regulatory approval of a treatment or disclosed commercial success. Visit My Genome Guard Visit Novacellum Cicada Market Making Cicada publicly announced a market-making relationship involving JASMY in March 2025. A market maker generally supports trading by providing bids and offers in the markets where it operates. This can help improve liquidity and reduce spreads, depending on market conditions and the scope of its activities. Market making does not guarantee that JASMY’s price will rise, prevent volatility or ensure that large transactions can occur without substantial slippage. The announcement should also be distinguished from evidence of current market depth. Assessing the market’s ability to absorb large purchases or sales requires up-to-date order-book and trading data. View Cicada’s announcement Chainlink Jasmy announced adoption of Chainlink’s Cross-Chain Interoperability Protocol and Cross-Chain Token standard in March 2025. The integration supports JASMY transfers between Ethereum and Base. JANCTION also announced adoption of Chainlink CCIP for its cross-chain plans. The technology is intended to support: cross-chain messaging standardised token transfers interoperability between supported networks broader access to tokens across blockchain ecosystems These capabilities should be distinguished from measured outcomes. An integration announcement does not, by itself, establish increased adoption, deeper liquidity or substantial transaction volume. This relationship is best described as a technology integration rather than a conventional joint venture. View Jasmy in the Chainlink ecosystem View JANCTION in the Chainlink ecosystem JasmyLab and JANCTION JasmyLab is a closely connected company developing significant parts of the wider Jasmy ecosystem. Its publicly described activities include: development and operation of JANCTION infrastructure distributed GPU services blockchain research and development JasmyChain infrastructure Web3 services Smart Render by JANCTION JANCTION has been presented as Jasmy’s first incubation project, extending the ecosystem into blockchain infrastructure, AI-related services and distributed computing. The systems have different functions: Jasmy provides personal-data and enterprise IoT technology. JasmyChain is an EVM-compatible Layer 2 network using JASMY as its gas token. JANCTION develops distributed computing and related infrastructure. JasmyLab develops and operates supporting products and services. JasmyLab announced completion of JasmyChain’s mainnet migration on 17 January 2026. These connections do not mean that every JANCTION service requires customers to buy JASMY. Token demand depends on the architecture, payment arrangements and actual use of each service. Read the JasmyChain mainnet announcement JasmyLab and JANCTION ecosystem partnerships JasmyLab has announced additional partnerships through JANCTION that extend the wider Jasmy ecosystem into wallet development, distributed computing, blockchain infrastructure and consumer applications. These agreements should be attributed to JasmyLab/JANCTION, rather than automatically described as direct partnerships with Jasmy Corporation. Their announcement dates also need to be distinguished from evidence of completed deployment or commercial adoption. Kana Labs / Xyra Labs JasmyLab announced a strategic partnership with Kana Labs in September 2023. The collaboration covered account-abstraction tools, cross-chain access for JASMY, connections between private and public blockchains, and joint international marketing. Kana Labs subsequently rebranded as Xyra Labs. These names should therefore not be counted as two unrelated partners. On 3 January 2026, JasmyLab announced a strategic partnership with Xyra Labs to jointly develop infrastructure for JANCTION Wallet. The announced development focuses on: simplifying wallet use through account abstraction enabling applications to sponsor gas fees reducing the complexity of keys, signatures and transactions making access to the JasmyChain ecosystem feel closer to a conventional login The announcements establish development relationships. They do not, by themselves, confirm that every proposed feature has launched or achieved significant adoption. Read the September 2023 partnership announcement Read the January 2026 Xyra announcement Rewardy On 26 December 2025, JasmyLab announced a strategic partnership with Rewardy Wallet, provided by South Korea-based Chainwith Global. The collaboration concerns the joint design of rewards, loyalty features and user experience for JANCTION Wallet. The proposed features include: participation missions and community activities displays showing points, benefits and campaign rewards clearer explanations of how rewards are earned and used support for partner-branded wallet experiences Rewardy’s announced role complements Xyra’s wallet-infrastructure work. Rewardy focuses on participation and rewards, while Xyra contributes account-abstraction and gas-management technology. These are announced development objectives, rather than confirmation that all functions are operational. Read the Rewardy partnership announcement Swan Chain On 10 February 2026, JANCTION announced a business partnership with Swan Chain, a decentralised AI infrastructure project. The announcement described access to approximately 25,000 computing resources, including CPUs, within Swan Chain’s ecosystem. This should not be described as JANCTION acquiring or owning 25,000 GPUs. The collaboration aims to expand the resources available through JANCTION’s GPU Pool and improve the flexibility and availability of its computing services. The announcement also described plans to progressively use Swan Chain nodes within JANCTION’s distributed-processing framework, subject to further development and validation. This is a documented computing-infrastructure partnership. Available capacity, actual utilisation and resulting revenue remain separate measures. Read JANCTION’s Swan Chain announcement Cabinet JANCTION announced a strategic partnership with Cabinet on 19 February 2026. The collaboration concerns Japan-based blockchain node infrastructure, operational technology and connectivity. Its stated objectives include improving Web3 connectivity in Japan and expanding validator-operation capabilities. This relationship supports the infrastructure layer of JANCTION’s ecosystem. It should be distinguished from a consumer application or a partnership directly involving JASMY purchases. Read the Cabinet partnership announcement AltLayer JANCTION announced a partnership with AltLayer on 20 February 2025 involving rollup technology and joint marketing. The stated objective was to improve interoperability and expand JANCTION’s blockchain-development environment. The announcement is evidence of a technical collaboration. Its original description of JANCTION’s planned Layer 2 architecture should be read in its historical context, rather than assumed to describe every aspect of the ecosystem’s current architecture. Read JANCTION’s AltLayer announcement Etarn / Carbon Earn Coretech On 27 August 2025, JasmyLab announced a strategic partnership with Carbon Earn Coretech FZco, the company behind Etarn’s “Toilet to Earn” project. The announcement identified Etarn as the first project joining the newly announced Arbitrum Orbit-based JasmyChain ecosystem. The proposed collaboration included: a planned bridge connecting Etarn’s existing blockchain environment with JasmyChain exploration of connections between smart-toilet IoT data and Jasmy technology potential collaboration involving carbon credits expansion into the Indian market These were announced plans and areas for exploration. The partnership announcement does not establish that the bridge, data integrations or carbon-credit arrangements have all been completed. Read the Etarn partnership announcement Decentralized Music Chain JANCTION announced a comprehensive partnership with Decentralized Music Chain, or DMC, in January 2025. A subsequent announcement described JANCTION GPU Pool infrastructure supporting the AI music platform DAIM. These announcements connect JANCTION’s infrastructure plans with music-related blockchain services and AI workloads. The agreements should be distinguished from evidence of current platform usage, customer revenue or measurable JASMY demand. Read the DMC partnership announcement Read the DAIM infrastructure announcement AppBank Jasmy announced a memorandum of understanding with AppBank on 28 September 2026 to advance joint business in AI and data-related services. The proposed collaboration combines Jasmy and its group’s infrastructure, including Personal Data Locker and GPU-pool technology, with AppBank’s business platform, including its AI BANK media service. The stated objective is to develop services through which individuals can manage and use their data while accessing AI. This is a confirmed MOU. It should be described as an agreement to pursue collaboration, rather than proof that every proposed product has launched or generated revenue. Read Jasmy’s AppBank announcement AVITA Technologies and NEXSTGO Jasmy announced a business alliance with Hong Kong-based NEXSTGO in February 2022 and subsequently publicised a joint venture with AVITA Technologies. The collaboration involved Blockchain PCs incorporating Jasmy Secure PC technology. This is a documented historical relationship. However, the original announcements should not be treated as evidence of its current sales volumes, geographic availability or commercial scale. Without recent operating information, its present status requires further confirmation. Read Jasmy’s AVITA announcement OCH OCH announced that it would begin handling Jasmy Secure PC on 17 February 2025. This establishes a commercial sales relationship. OCH’s announcement also includes a statement from Jasmy expressing an intention to strengthen the partnership. Jasmy Secure PC provides functions relating to device management, data-leakage prevention, activity logs and analysis of working practices. The sales announcement confirms an additional route to market. It does not disclose customer numbers or resulting revenue. Read OCH’s announcement Sony Biz Networks Jasmy has a documented technology-alliance relationship with Sony Biz Networks, a Sony-group company. Jasmy Secure PC integrated with AKASHI, the attendance-management platform then operated by Sony Biz Networks. The integration uses computer activity logs to support working-time records and help identify discrepancies between recorded attendance and actual computer use. AKASHI transferred to Money Forward in March 2026. The historical Sony Biz Networks relationship is documented, although its current scope and the integration’s ongoing support arrangements require further confirmation. This is a relationship with a specific Sony-group company. It should not be presented as a partnership covering Sony Group as a whole, PlayStation or other Sony businesses. View Jasmy’s Secure PC integration documentation Read Money Forward’s AKASHI announcement S.A.S. and Kinrou no Shishi Jasmy announced integration between Jasmy Secure PC and Kinrou no Shishi, the cloud attendance-management system operated by S.A.S., in February 2024. The integration uses computer logs to support working-time records and help identify discrepancies between formal attendance records and actual computer activity. This is a documented enterprise-system integration. Its announcement should be distinguished from evidence of current customer numbers or commercial scale. Together with the historical AKASHI integration, it demonstrates Jasmy Secure PC’s ability to connect with external attendance-management systems. Read Jasmy’s announcements Dimage Share Dimage Share developed the carbon-credit trading platform using Jasmy’s blockchain technology that became NCCX, the Natural Capital Credit Exchange. Dimage Share’s project account describes work beginning with a proof of concept in April 2023 and progressing to release in August 2024. Jasmy described the August release as a beta platform. Jasmy subsequently announced the start of J Blue Credit trading on NCCX in December 2024. The platform applies digital records to the issuance, transfer and tracking of carbon-credit-related tokens. This provides a documented environmental-market application for Jasmy technology. However, the platform’s existence does not establish substantial trading activity, revenue or direct JASMY demand. Read Dimage Share’s project account Read Jasmy’s announcements Earlier announced relationships Jasmy has also publicised a range of earlier collaborations. These form part of its corporate history, but the original announcements do not establish that every project remains active in 2026. Nippon Travel Agency Jasmy has publicised collaboration with Nippon Travel Agency involving digital services and personal-data use in tourism. The historical relationship should be distinguished from a confirmed current nationwide deployment or ongoing revenue stream. Transcosmos Jasmy and Transcosmos announced work involving secure remote contact-centre operations. The collaboration applied Jasmy’s security and device-management technology to remote working. Recent operating evidence would be needed to establish its present scale. Witz Corporation Jasmy has announced collaboration with Witz involving Personal Data Locker and mobility- or tourism-related services. Witz’s involvement in Toyota-related projects does not, by itself, establish a direct commercial agreement between Jasmy and Toyota Motor Corporation. Koozyt Jasmy and Koozyt announced development work involving the KJ Engine and AI-based data analysis. This should be treated as a historical development relationship unless newer evidence establishes its current operating status. Japanias Jasmy and Japanias announced cooperation involving research and proof-of-concept work in AI, IoT and cloud technologies. An announcement of research cooperation should not be treated as evidence of a completed commercial deployment. Synergy Marketing Synergy Marketing’s en-chant service has been associated with supporter missions and engagement activities in the Sagan Tosu ecosystem. This is a service-level connection and should be described separately from a broader corporate alliance. Mystiko.Network Jasmy announced technical cooperation with Mystiko.Network involving zero-knowledge technology and privacy-related applications. The historical announcement should be distinguished from confirmation that the proposed technology is currently deployed across Jasmy’s products. Green Carbon Jasmy announced participation in Green Carbon’s rice-farming consortium, which focuses on generating carbon credits through reductions in methane emissions. Consortium participation does not, by itself, establish carbon-credit sales, project revenue or JASMY purchases. VAIO and Daiwabo Information System Jasmy’s historical materials include VAIO and Daiwabo Information System in connection with its early IoT and Secure PC initiatives. In November 2018, Jasmy announced that it had begun considering collaboration with VAIO towards next-generation IoT businesses. These historical connections should not automatically be described as continuing, comprehensive corporate partnerships without newer evidence. Centrality and SingleSource Jasmy announced a business alliance with Centrality in June 2018 and a relationship with SingleSource in October 2018. These announcements form part of Jasmy’s corporate history. They do not, on their own, establish major active partnerships in 2026. Claims without verified public evidence of a direct partnership Accuracy matters because exaggerated claims weaken the credibility of Jasmy’s documented achievements. A claim of a direct partnership should identify the exact legal entities, the agreement or integration, its announcement date and an original source. This article does not establish a direct corporate partnership between Jasmy and: Apple Toyota Motor Corporation Sony Corporation or Sony Group Corporation as a whole (Ando aims to partner with #SonyLife - stated in his interview with former $Google Japan president Koichiro #Tsujino. 30 October 2026) NVIDIA Robinhood Ripple Remixpoint Infinite Matrix Technology or a JPYD issuer an exchange solely because it lists JASMY This is a statement about the evidence presented, rather than proof that no private agreement could exist. Exchange listings, shared technology, personnel connections, event appearances and relationships through third parties do not automatically establish a direct partnership. The Panasonic relationship also requires precise wording. The documented collaborator is Panasonic Advanced Technology, and the scope should not be extended automatically to other Panasonic entities. What the network tells us Jasmy’s documented relationships reach across several distinct markets: Panasonic Advanced Technology: IoT development and distributed GPU rendering Aplix and Sagan Tosu: supporter services and regional commerce Cybertrust: identity verification Novacellum and Biomedica Solution: genomic information and personalised-medicine research Cicada: announced market-making activity Chainlink: cross-chain technology JasmyLab and JANCTION: blockchain, AI-related services and GPU infrastructure AppBank: proposed AI and data-service collaboration AKASHI and S.A.S.: attendance-system integrations Dimage Share: carbon-credit trading infrastructure OCH: Secure PC sales and distribution The significance lies in the specific work being undertaken and the stage each relationship has reached. Panasonic Advanced Technology provides evidence of reported technical development. Cybertrust supplies an established identity-verification integration. Aplix and Sagan Tosu demonstrate a launched consumer-service initiative. The healthcare project applies personal-data infrastructure to sensitive genomic information. These are meaningful developments, but technical progress, commercial adoption and token demand are different measures. A service can use Jasmy technology without requiring its customers to buy JASMY directly. For example, the August 2026 Smart Render announcement envisaged yen-denominated prepaid credits and a user experience that did not require cryptocurrency or a wallet. Conclusion Jasmy’s documented corporate network provides a stronger basis for analysis than unsupported partnership claims. The available announcements show activity across IoT, digital identity, workplace security, sport, healthcare, carbon markets, blockchain interoperability and distributed computing. The Panasonic Advanced Technology collaboration illustrates a documented progression: collaboration beginning in 2024, reported platform-development results in September 2025 and a further distributed-GPU initiative announced in August 2026. That progression is significant, while still requiring a distinction between internal testing, service availability, paying customers and disclosed revenue. The next question is how these relationships translate into measurable outcomes: active users, customer contracts, service revenue, data managed, transactions processed and any demonstrable demand for JASMY. Those measures will provide a clearer picture of the ecosystem’s commercial value than the number of corporate names associated with it.

What was announced today, 27 October 2026? #BlackRock Financial Management, BlackRock Japan, #SBI Holdings and #Startale Group signed an MOU to explore connecting tokenised money market funds with JPYSC, a yen-denominated, trust-type stablecoin. What are the companies exploring? Their work covers the technology needed to connect the assets, possible business and distribution models, and regulatory and market-development questions. The companies may also engage with other potential participants. At this time, this is exploratory. The announcement does not confirm a finished product, a launch date or a service that customers can use. One of my previous blog’s, 23 September 2026, titled, ‘BlackRock’s Latest Paper: Where Jasmy Could Fit in the Machine-Native Economy’ addresses how the #Jasmy ecosystem could fit the #Blackrock narrative. The papers do not mention #Jasmy but the similarities in infrastructure are highly unique. What might the Blackrock, SBI and Startale MOU connection be used for? The companies are examining whether blockchain-based fund units and yen stablecoins could operate within a connected financial system. That might support settlement or transfers related to fund transactions. The announcement does not describe a transaction flow or confirm that users will be able to exchange #JPYSC directly for tokenised fund units. That remains a possible use case, not a confirmed feature. What did the Japanese government announce about cyber attacks? Yesterday, 26 October, Prime Minister Sanae #Takaichi convened a cybersecurity meeting after a series of attacks and data leaks affecting Japanese companies. She directed the government to prepare an emergency package of additional measures by the following week. The proposed work includes stronger support for affected businesses, improved information gathering and analysis, and earlier use of AI-assisted vulnerability checks and cyber-attack monitoring across supply chains. How does that relate to the #BlackRock #SBI #Startale MOU? It provides important context: Japan is trying to expand digital financial infrastructure while also responding to growing cyber risks and data breaches. But, tokenising funds and connecting them to a stablecoin would not, by itself, prevent cyber attacks or protect personal data. How does #Blackrock's goals relate to #JANCTION and #Jasmy? The strongest connection is #BlackRock’s focus on compute as an emerging digital-asset market. This is very close to the opportunity behind #JANCTION and Smart Render. Smart Render has been described as a distributed rendering application that uses company-owned GPUs alongside connected idle GPUs, with work allocated across the network. And, #BlackRock describes blockchains as particularly suited to, 'High-frequency, sub-cent, machine-to-machine (M2M) transactions'. That is a meaningful conceptual fit with #JasmyChain’s role as an L2 where #JASMY is used as custom gas. How is Jasmy connected to Startale? #Kyohei Ito’s public career profile lists him as Lead Solution Architect at Startale Labs from April to June 2023. In April 2026, he joined #JasmyLab as Vice-President of Engineering. JasmyLab now identifies Kyohei as its Head of Engineering. That creates a personnel link between #Startale and #JasmyLab. It does not establish a current partnership, or show that Ito worked on JPYSC or this MOU. What is the Sony connection? #Sony Block Solutions Labs, which develops Soneium, is a joint venture between Sony Group and Startale Labs. The venture was established in 2023; Sony announced Soneium in 2024. Jasmy is also a separate company whose leadership includes former Sony executives, including Kunitake #Ando. That gives Jasmy and Soneium a Sony-related connection, but it does not establish that Jasmy is involved in #Soneium. Could JASMY operate on Soneium? There is a possible technical route. JASMY is an #Ethereum ERC‑20 token, and Soneium’s documentation explains how token issuers can deploy an ERC‑20 on Soneium and submit it for inclusion in the network’s token list. That does not confirm that JASMY is deployed, supported or planned for use there. Does the cyber announcement create a Jasmy opportunity? There is a conceptual connection worth watching: Jasmy’s Personal Data Locker (#PDL) is positioned around personal data management, while the government has highlighted the harm caused by data leaks. That makes data control and protection more prominent issues in Japan. However, the government has not named $Jasmy or endorsed its technology. And a Personal Data Locker should not be presented as a solution to the cyber-attacks described. Any role for Jasmy would depend on a specific product, deployment and confirmed customer or government engagement. Summary The BlackRock–SBI–Startale MOU and Japan’s recent cybersecurity discussions point to two developments unfolding alongside the growth of digital finance: companies are exploring ways to connect and protect tokenised funds with yen stablecoins, while the government is responding to cyber attacks and data leaks affecting Japanese businesses. These developments share a broader context, but they are not presented as directly connected yet. The government has not named Jasmy's role or outlined its technology pathway. Jasmy has identifiable personnel and Sony-related links to parts of this wider ecosystem, but no confirmed role in the MOU or the government’s cyber response yet. Needless to say, Jasmy was Japan's first authorised cryptocurrancy. Any future opportunity would depend on a specific, confirmed product or deployment. I will keep you updated on any developments.

For holders watching JCT rise while JASMY lags, the documented two-chain relationship offers a reason to reassess the fundamentals before switching tokens. 22 October 2026 Watching #JANCTION’s JCT token climb while #JASMY fails to keep the same pace can be frustrating. For holders facing that situation, the temptation is understandable: sell the token that appears to be standing still and move into the one attracting attention. But relative price performance alone does not establish that JASMY’s investment case has deteriorated, or that JCT offers a better opportunity from today’s entry price. Before switching, it is worth examining what each token does and whether the reasons for holding JASMY have actually changed. The documentary evidence gives JASMY holders a concrete reason to keep its role in view: #JasmyLab has described JANCTION and JasmyChain as complementary parts of a two-chain architecture, with JASMY serving as JasmyChain’s gas token. JANCTION attracting attention does not, by itself, make that function redundant. The relationship between JANCTION and JasmyChain is supported by more than shared branding or community speculation. #JasmyLab has explicitly published a two-chain architecture and described how #JasmyChain is designed to support #JANCTION. The clearest evidence comes from the company’s own announcements: one identifies the two-chain structure, later releases name the proprietary Layer 1 as JANCTION, and the current JasmyChain product page explains its intended role in usage records, settlement and rewards. Together, they substantiate a broader technical relationship, while leaving some implementation details unverified. The original announcement explicitly describes two chains In its 26 August 2025 announcement, JasmyLab included a section titled “2つのチェーンについて”—“About the two chains”. It described a structure combining an Ethereum-compatible Layer 2 with a proprietary Layer 1. Component Documented role JasmyChain L2 A public, EVM-compatible network based on Arbitrum Orbit, using JASMY for gas and executing DeFi and other decentralised applications. Proprietary L1 A separate layer intended for rendering, audio separation and video upscaling. The release stated that this L1 was under development at that time. This is direct evidence of a two-chain design. It should be read with its publication date: the announcement establishes what JasmyLab described in August 2025, rather than proving every component’s present operational status. Later releases identify the Layer 1 as JANCTION JasmyLab’s 17 December 2025 announcement explicitly identifies its proprietary Layer 1 blockchain as “JANCTION”. It describes a partner joining the verification-node business, with JasmyLab responsible for node configuration, operation, monitoring and development of task allocation, verification and finalisation protocols. A 28 November 2025 release describes GPU servers dedicated to verifying distributed task results on the proprietary L1. It also distinguishes those verification servers from JANCTION GPU Pool, the service supplying computing resources. That distinction adds precision to the phrase “JANCTION handles GPU computing”. The ecosystem includes computing resources and a blockchain verification function; those functions should not automatically be treated as the same activity. JasmyChain’s intended contribution is explicitly stated On its current official JasmyChain page, JasmyLab includes a section headed “Integration with JANCTION”. “Designed as the foundation for usage records, settlement, and reward distribution on JANCTION — compute and trust on one technical base.” This is the strongest explanation of the functional relationship. JANCTION supplies distributed computing infrastructure, while JasmyChain is designed to support the records and financial processes around its use. In practical terms, a computing service needs ways to account for resource use, settle obligations and distribute rewards. My interpretation is that JasmyLab is positioning JasmyChain to provide those supporting blockchain functions. The product statement establishes that intended integration; it does not identify all production contracts or show that every JANCTION service already uses them. Jasmy Australia explanatory graphic based on JasmyLab publications. The relationship shown is designed integration; it does not establish a live bridge or settlement hierarchy. What the patents contribute Jasmy’s patent documents add relevant background to its approach to data, security and blockchain-based records. They are supporting technical context, rather than proof of the named JANCTION–JasmyChain implementation. JP7313642B2 — Terminal device, information processing system and program describes controlled disclosure of personal information with reduced identifying detail, including blockchain recording. Its description also contemplates a separate sidechain for virtual currency. This shows that separating currency functions into another chain appears in Jasmy’s disclosed technical work. It does not identify that sidechain as JANCTION or JasmyChain, and a sidechain is not automatically an Arbitrum rollup. JP7719450B2 — Terminal device and program addresses software-specific key creation, encryption of software-generated information and recording that information on a blockchain. This provides context for secure application records, but it does not establish a bridge between JANCTION L1 and JasmyChain L2. These documents support the broader technical themes of controlled data disclosure and secure blockchain records. The company announcements remain the direct evidence for the specific two-chain relationship. The company disclosures provide direct evidence of the two-chain relationship. The patents support related data and security concepts, rather than proving this specific implementation. What this means for JASMY, and the separate JCT question The 17 January 2026 JasmyChain mainnet announcement confirms JASMY as the network’s custom gas token. If JANCTION-related records, settlement or reward transactions execute on JasmyChain, they would require JASMY gas under that design. The amount of demand would depend on actual use and fees. Could JCT also come to JasmyChain? There is a further possibility: JCT itself could potentially be supported on JasmyChain. JANCTION’s tokenomics documentation lists Ethereum and BNB Smart Chain deployments. The JasmyChain mainnet announcement confirms compatibility with existing #Solidity smart contracts and development tools. Together, these facts support a plausible technical route for an authorised JCT deployment or bridged representation. This is a technical inference, rather than a confirmed launch plan. Such support would require an approved implementation, secure contracts, accurate supply accounting and appropriate wallet or bridge support. We have not verified an official JCT contract or operational JCT bridge on JasmyChain. This is an additional possibility within the broader relationship. JANCTION could use JasmyChain for records, settlement or rewards without JCT itself being deployed there. Equally, JCT could potentially become available on JasmyChain while JANCTION retains its separate L1 infrastructure. If JCT transfers were implemented on JasmyChain, executing those transfers would require JASMY gas under the network’s announced design. The documented role for JASMY therefore exists independently of a future JCT deployment; supporting JCT could add another source of network activity. Neither possibility establishes how much demand would result or guarantees a price increase. A rising JCT price does not erase JASMY’s role The important question for a JASMY holder is whether there is still a credible route from ecosystem use to demand for JASMY. The documented route is transaction fees on JasmyChain. JasmyLab’s stated integration of JANCTION usage records, settlement and rewards provides a potential source of that activity. My inference is that successful JANCTION adoption could complement JASMY’s utility if it generates activity on JasmyChain. That depends on implementation and actual usage. A JCT price rally, by itself, does not demonstrate increased GPU customers, more JasmyChain transactions or additional JASMY demand. JCT and JASMY are separate assets with different roles and market dynamics. Their connection does not require their prices to move together, and the evidence does not establish that JASMY must catch up. Equally, a period of weaker price performance is not enough to show that JASMY’s role has disappeared. Give the holding thesis a fair review before switching A decision to move from JASMY into JCT involves two judgments: the case for selling JASMY and the case for buying JCT at the available price. Recent gains cannot answer both questions. For holders whose long-term thesis centres on JASMY’s use as network gas and the development of JasmyChain, the relevant evidence remains adoption, transaction activity, integration delivery and the amount of JASMY those activities actually require. Those are stronger grounds for reviewing a holding than frustration with another token’s chart. There is a reason to remain interested in JASMY: its documented function continues to exist within the architecture JANCTION is helping develop. Continuing to hold can be a reasoned choice where that thesis still fits the evidence and the holder’s circumstances. It should remain open to review as new information arrives. What the evidence establishes JasmyLab has publicly described a two-chain architecture, identified its proprietary L1 as JANCTION, and positioned JasmyChain L2 as infrastructure for JANCTION usage records, settlement and rewards. The broader relationship illustrated in the graphics therefore has an official documentary basis. What remains unverified is the precise live connection between those chains: the reviewed sources do not establish a particular operational bridge, prove that JasmyChain settles onto JANCTION L1, or confirm JCT deployment on JasmyChain. The mainnet announcement documents an Ethereum–JasmyChain JASMY bridge, which is a different connection. For JASMY holders considering a switch, this relationship is worth understanding before making a decision. JANCTION’s rally does not erase JASMY’s documented role. JASMY and JCT serve distinct, potentially complementary functions within the wider ecosystem; the strength of that relationship depends on how their services are integrated and used. Jasmy Australia is an independent publication and is not affiliated with Jasmy Incorporated. The author holds JASMY. This article examines published technical information and does not constitute financial advice.

The three project partners. Official image supplied by Jasmy in its 27 November 2023 announcement. Logos belong to their respective owners. [1] Jasmy’s My Genome Guard project gives its personal data technology a specific role in healthcare: managing genomic information while supporting research into personalised cancer treatment. It also includes a defined use for Jasmy tokens through participant payments. The project brings together Jasmy, Novacellum and Biomedica Solution, combining expertise in data management, genomic research and peptide manufacturing. There is also a confirmed 2026 milestone. On 24 April 2026 both medical partners announced that the project had entered full operation that financial year. That takes the story beyond its original announcement, although published enrolment numbers, revenue and payment volumes are still needed to assess its scale. For those following #Jasmy, the project deserves attention because it makes the company’s ideas about personal data easier to understand. It offers a practical example of how sensitive information, permission to use it and participant benefits can be managed together. What My Genome Guard does The project supports whole-genome analysis and the development of a cancer immunotherapy called CTC neoantigen dendritic cell therapy. Its website describes genetic testing through the Green Chord service, with participating medical institutions explaining relevant results to members. Member information and genomic analysis information are managed through Jasmy’s Personal Data Locker, or PDL. There are two related activities here. One is the analysis and management of participants’ genetic information. The other is support for a particular approach to cancer treatment if a participant later becomes eligible under the project’s conditions. Joining the project should not be read as a promise that someone will avoid cancer or benefit from a particular treatment. Jasmy supplies the information technology. Novacellum develops the medical approach and works with medical institutions. Biomedica Solution manufactures the personalised neoantigen peptides used in the treatment. Keeping these responsibilities clear helps explain what Jasmy contributes and where medical decisions sit. The personalised treatment explained The terminology sounds complicated, but the underlying research idea is understandable. CTCs are circulating tumour cells: cancer cells found in the bloodstream. Neoantigens are distinctive markers arising from changes in cancer cells, and these markers can differ between patients. Novacellum’s approach aims to identify suitable markers and use them in an immune treatment involving dendritic cells, which help the immune system recognise targets. An accessible way to think about it is that the treatment seeks to give the immune system information about the particular cancer it needs to recognise. That is why the genetic analysis and the handling of the resulting information matter to the project. The research should also be described at the right level. In November 2025, Novacellum highlighted a published study examining circulating tumour cells from 11 people with advanced cancer and identifying candidate neoantigens. The company explicitly said the research explored the possibility of understanding individual cancers without obtaining tumour tissue; it did not directly determine clinical care or treatment decisions. That is evidence of research activity. It does not establish that My Genome Guard has demonstrated improved survival or that every participant can receive effective treatment. Those would require different clinical evidence. Why genomic information needs careful management The value of the project for Jasmy becomes clearer when the focus shifts to the information involved. Genomic research requires people and organisations to work with highly sensitive material, while participants need to understand who can access it and how it is being used. Jasmy’s 2023 technical announcement described an enhanced PDL, provisionally called Super PDL. Its proposed features included access requiring permission from both the individual and specified medical parties, separating genomic information from directly identifying information, retaining traceability and accommodating large datasets. This is a more demanding task than giving someone a folder in cloud storage. A useful system has to connect a person to their rights while limiting unnecessary disclosure of identity and health information to others. In its December 2024 development account, Jasmy described adding servers and control functions linked to blockchain. It also reported obtaining ISMS certification in April 2024. These are company-reported implementation milestones; they should not be treated as proof that any system is immune to security failures. Jasmy’s original PDL illustration. The four functions shown are safe storage, permission-based sharing, monitoring for unintended use and sharing abstracted data without identifying the person. Japanese original. Source: Jasmy, PR TIMES STORY, 3 December 2024. What blockchain contributes The published design uses blockchain as part of a wider information-management system. Jasmy describes traceability, digital membership rights and mechanisms for participant payments. Its materials do not establish that complete, readable genome files are published on a public blockchain. The practical question is whether the system can maintain a reliable connection between permission, information use and the benefits a participant is entitled to receive. For example, a research organisation may need access to authorised information without needing the participant’s name. A payment process may need to confirm that a person holds membership rights without publicly exposing their medical records. Those examples explain the potential usefulness of the architecture. They are not independent verification that every part of the published design is operating at scale. The project website also describes an NFT as evidence of participation rights. Here, the NFT’s stated purpose is to represent membership benefits and entitlements. Readers should not infer that it is a separately valuable collectible or that holding it gives ownership of the underlying medical technology. Where JASMY tokens fit My Genome Guard has an explicit connection to the token. Jasmy’s original announcements describe token payments for eligible information contributions and a conditional research-support payment called Mutual Aid Payment, or MAP. They also describe retaining Jasmy tokens corresponding to part of the participation fees to support the assistance arrangement. The published first-round membership terms provide a concrete detail: a one-time MAP payment of 123,526 JMY, subject to the stated eligibility conditions. The same terms specify a membership period ending on 31 March 2030 and cap membership at 1,000 people. JMY is the notation used in those Japanese materials for Jasmy Coin. These are first-round contractual provisions, not evidence that the maximum membership has been reached. This makes the token connection more specific than an assumption that every use of Jasmy software automatically requires customers to buy JASMY. Here, the project documents actually name token-based participant benefits. However, a payment denominated in tokens does not by itself reveal how many tokens must be bought on an exchange, when they are acquired or how long recipients keep them. Those details matter when assessing market demand. Paying a participant transfers tokens; it does not automatically remove them permanently from circulation. What participants are actually promised The project website describes conditional peptide-manufacturing support and MAP assistance for qualifying members. It also states that the therapy is paid care outside public insurance coverage. The support should therefore not be described as free comprehensive cancer treatment. The first-round terms make the conditions material. The MAP provision depends on peptide synthesis being completed and approved treatment beginning at a designated medical institution. The accompanying disclosures also warn that payment quantities may be reduced if Jasmy’s business or financial circumstances change and say that protection through an insurance policyholder protection organisation is unavailable. These details matter because they prevent membership benefits being mistaken for an unconditional medical or financial guarantee. A digital certificate records rights under an agreement; the agreement still determines what those rights mean. Jasmy’s original treatment-support and MAP illustration. It connects the member, Novacellum, designated medical institutions, Biomedica Solution and Jasmy. The arrows show referral, sampling, peptide manufacture, treatment, information storage and assistance payment. Japanese original; the illustration does not replace the membership conditions. Source: Jasmy, PR TIMES STORY, 3 December 2024. [3] What changed in 2026 The project was announced on 27 November 2023. Jasmy published a detailed development account on 3 December 2024, and the project website lists an initial recruitment period running from 2 December 2024 to 31 March 2025. [1, 3, 4] The partner announcements dated 24 April 2026 then confirmed full operation that financial year. Their wording supports an operational milestone, but the short notices do not provide enrolment totals, revenue, numbers treated or token-payment volumes. This chronology matters when the project appears on social media. It is reasonable to discuss its continuing relevance in 2026. It would be misleading to present the original partnership as a brand-new October announcement, or to infer that the older recruitment dates establish that applications remain open today. Why it matters to the wider Jasmy business My assessment is that the project’s strongest strategic value lies in the capabilities Jasmy develops and demonstrates through it. A system that manages sensitive information, distinct permissions and participant entitlements could have applications beyond this particular programme. That possibility depends on further deployments and commercial demand. Jasmy’s own December 2024 account adds useful context. The company acknowledged that the project’s economics were difficult from its perspective, while describing the PDL development and security-management work as valuable outcomes. That was a historical assessment, not a current financial statement, but it argues against assuming the initiative was already a major profit centre. For investors, three questions therefore need separate answers. Does the technology solve a useful problem? Can Jasmy earn sustainable revenue from delivering it? Does that activity create meaningful, recurring demand for JASMY? Progress on the first question is encouraging, but it does not settle the other two. The evidence to watch next The next useful update would provide measurable adoption. Confirmed participant numbers would show how far the programme has progressed. The number of completed genomic analyses or participating medical institutions would help establish the extent of delivery. Financial disclosure would answer a different question: whether the project generates revenue for Jasmy and how delivery costs compare with that income. Token reporting would be useful too, particularly aggregate payment volumes, the source of tokens and any disclosed reserve arrangements. Medical outcomes require their own evidence. Published research, clearly described study methods and clinical results would be more informative than broad claims about a cancer breakthrough. Commercial success and clinical effectiveness must each be assessed on their own evidence. My Genome Guard gives Jasmy a documented role in a healthcare programme with an explicit token component. I see a credible reason to follow its progress. The next step in assessing its importance is evidence showing how widely it is used, what it earns and how the token mechanism functions in practice. Sources Japanese primary sources checked on 21 October 2026. English descriptions are paraphrases. The project website and terms were available through indexed search extracts; direct retrieval was restricted. First-round terms are identified as such throughout and are not represented as newly issued 2026 terms. [1] Jasmy partnership announcement, 27 November 2023. Read source [2] Jasmy technical and payment-design announcement, 27 November 2023. Read source [3] Jasmy development account, 3 December 2024. Read source [4] Official My Genome Guard project website. Read source [5] Published first-round membership terms, established 2 December 2024, especially articles 1, 7 and 12 and the pre-contract disclosures. Read source [6] Novacellum full-operation announcement, 24 April 2026. Read source [7] Biomedica Solution full-operation announcement, 24 April 2026. Read source [8] Novacellum explanation of neoantigens and its treatment approach. Read source [9] Novacellum research notice, 25 November 2025. Read source This is an independent Jasmy Australia article, unaffiliated with Jasmy Corporation. It discusses the project and its investment relevance and does not recommend medical treatment or an investment.

14 October 2026 An intriguing concept shared by Kyohei (@kyohei_nft), associated with #Jasmy Group's #DEEPPOINT, #SmartRender and #PDL initiatives, explores a different approach to digital advertising. Yesterday, Kyohei posted on X the following: あらゆるUI要素をLiquid Grass化することで、ページのbackground全体を広告枠にする邪法デザインパターンを思い付いた X translation to English: I came up with a nefarious design pattern that turns the entire page background into an ad space by converting every UI element into Liquid Glass. Kyohei also posted the following: これ有用かもしれない。インフルエンサーとのコラボや、協賛企業のPV再生など。 X translation to English: This might be useful. Collaborations with influencers, or PV plays from sponsoring companies, etc. What if the entire website became the advertisement, rather than simply displaying advertisements? What is the concept? Kyohei proposes transforming webpage elements into translucent, Liquid Glass-style components, allowing advertising imagery to occupy the entire background. Buttons, menus and content panels remain functional while a sponsor's branding becomes part of the overall visual experience. Essentially, the website itself becomes advertising space. Has this been done before? Similar concepts exist, including Spotify homepage takeovers, website skins and immersive advertising. However, Kyohei's approach could be different because the interface itself becomes visually integrated with the advertising. The distinction is between advertising around website content and advertising through the website's visual design. It is brilliant and incredibly innovative. What are the commercial benefits? The concept creates several potential opportunities: Influencer collaborations: Brands sponsor an influencer's entire website appearance Corporate sponsorship: Companies purchase exclusive branded website experiences Product launches: Websites temporarily adopt promotional themes Sponsored page views: Publishers potentially generate premium advertising revenue Dynamic campaigns: Advertising backgrounds change according to sponsors or promotional periods The commercial attraction is increased brand visibility without relying exclusively on conventional advertising placements. Could this generate meaningful revenue? Potentially. Consider a website generating 500,000 monthly page views, then consider the potential advertising rates. This is hypothetical, but demonstrates how an immersive sponsorship model could create an additional revenue stream. Actual revenue would depend on advertiser demand, audience engagement and campaign performance. What are the challenges? Transparency must not compromise readability, navigation or accessibility. Sponsored experiences would also require clear advertising disclosure. The objective would be to create an immersive advertising environment without disrupting the website's functionality or user experience. Why is this interesting for Jasmy? #Kyohei's involvement with DEEPPOINT, SmartRender and PDL makes the concept particularly interesting to followers of the broader #Jasmy ecosystem. Potential future applications could involve digital content, creator monetisation and privacy-conscious advertising. Whilst no direct integration with JasmyChain, PDL or the JASMY token has been confirmed, the concept demonstrates the intelligence and innovative minds of the Jasmy team, in particular Kyohei. What happens next? The important developments to watch would be a working demonstration, advertiser partnerships and evidence of commercial adoption. If the concept can be implemented across multiple websites, it could potentially develop into a reusable advertising platform. Final thoughts #Kyohei's experiment challenges a fundamental assumption of digital advertising: that advertisements need their own designated space. Instead, it proposes that websites themselves became the advertising medium? It is an interesting idea with potential applications for influencers, publishers and corporate sponsors. Whether it becomes commercially significant remains to be seen, but it is another creative development worth watching within the wider Jasmy ecosystem. Original concept: へいきょ | Kyohei (@kyohei_nft). Commercial scenarios and potential Jasmy integrations are speculative, not confirmed announcements.

How #Jasmy could combine its patented technologies to create new opportunities in digital identity, cybersecurity, smart cities, energy infrastructure and enterprise services. Most people associate Jasmy with cryptocurrency, Personal Data Locker #PDL, Secure PC and #JasmyChain. However, examining Jasmy's patents collectively reveals something potentially much more significant. Rather than developing isolated technologies, Jasmy may have the building blocks for interconnected commercial ecosystems. Its patented inventions cover the following areas: personal information management identity verification biometric authentication cryptographic security blockchain records distributed electricity systems. By combining these technologies, Jasmy could enter several substantial markets.The following table presents 12 possible commercial scenarios, ranked by their potential strategic and commercial significance. Rank Commercial scenario Patented technologies combined Potential application Revenue opportunities Potential JASMY impact 1 National digital identity platform PDL + biometric authentication + encrypted data sharing Secure identity verification across banking, insurance, employment and government services Verification fees, subscriptions, licensing Blockchain identity transactions 2 Smart cities powered by Jasmy Electricity management + IoT security + blockchain records Smart buildings, solar networks, batteries and coordinated electricity exchanges Infrastructure licensing, energy software, transaction services Blockchain energy transactions 3 National employee credentials platform PDL + identity verification + encrypted credentials Portable qualifications, employment records and professional licences Employer subscriptions, credential verification fees On-chain credential records 4 Secure financial identity network PDL + biometrics + cryptographic security Customer identity verification, secure financial access and audit records Banking software, authentication licensing Verification and audit transactions 5 Integrated insurance technology Secure PC + PDL + employee credentials Combined insurance staff accreditation, cybersecurity and information management Recurring SaaS subscriptions, enterprise contracts Credential and security transactions 6 Smart solar neighbourhoods Electricity exchange + battery controls + blockchain Coordinated household solar generation, battery storage and electricity transfers Energy management subscriptions, transaction services Electricity-related network activity 7 Enterprise cybersecurity ecosystem Secure PC + biometric authentication + application cryptography Secure employee devices, applications and enterprise information Per-device licensing, managed security services Blockchain security records 8 Healthcare information network PDL + identity verification + encrypted sharing Patient-controlled medical information exchange Healthcare software licensing, subscriptions Consent and verification transactions 9 Industrial IoT security network Device cryptography + blockchain records Secure connected equipment, factories and infrastructure Device licensing, industrial cybersecurity High-volume device transactions 10 Global professional digital passport PDL + biometric identity + encrypted credentials International verification of professional qualifications Credential fees, licensing, employer subscriptions Blockchain credential verification 11 Energy compliance platform Blockchain energy records + secure IoT + electricity management Verifiable electricity generation, consumption and transfer records Compliance software, auditing, licensing Energy audit transactions 12 Global privacy technology platform PDL + biometric authentication + international patent rights Licensing privacy and authentication technology internationally Licensing, enterprise subscriptions, partnerships Potential international JasmyChain usage These are hypothetical applications based on published patent technologies, not confirmed Jasmy commercial projects. Potential JASMY impacts depend on actual JasmyChain integration. Which opportunities are most promising? Opportunity Commercial potential Near-term feasibility Why it matters Digital identity Very high Medium Broad applications across regulated industries Smart cities and energy Very high Low Potential expansion into physical infrastructure Employee credentials High High Builds on Jasmy Skill Management Financial identity Very high Medium Large market for secure authentication Insurance technology High High Combines existing commercial offerings Solar neighbourhoods Very high Low New distributed-energy market Enterprise cybersecurity High High Potential recurring software revenue Healthcare data Very high Low–medium Sensitive-data management at scale Industrial IoT High Medium Potentially large connected-device networks Professional credentials High Medium–high Portable, verifiable qualifications Energy compliance High Low–medium Auditable energy transaction records Global privacy licensing Very high Medium–low International commercial scalability The three combinations that stand out 1. Digital identity, Personal Data Locker and biometrics This combination has the strongest connection to Jasmy's established personal-data strategy. It could support services where individuals securely verify their identity or credentials without unnecessarily exposing sensitive information. 2. Distributed electricity, secure IoT and blockchain Jasmy's published energy-related patent application, WO2026028636A1, makes this particularly interesting. Combining electricity management with secure connected devices and blockchain records could create opportunities in solar communities, energy infrastructure and smart cities. 3. Secure PC, employee credentials and insurance services This may offer the clearest near-term commercial pathway. Jasmy already offers Secure PC and launched Jasmy Skill Management in October 2026. Combining these capabilities could strengthen enterprise subscriptions and create opportunities for additional services. What could this mean for JASMY? The distinction between corporate revenue and token demand is essential. Jasmy could earn revenue through software subscriptions, licensing and enterprise contracts without necessarily creating significant demand for JASMY. However, JasmyChain uses JASMY as its gas token. If future commercial platforms require JasmyChain for verification, credential records, device security or energy transactions, genuine adoption could increase network activity. For example, a hypothetical platform with one million users completing 10 blockchain transactions monthly would generate 120 million transactions annually. That would represent substantial network usage, although the financial effect on JASMY would depend on gas fees, token economics and actual transaction requirements. Conclusion: An interconnected technology ecosystem Jasmy's patents suggest technological capabilities extending well beyond its cryptocurrency identity. The most commercially immediate opportunities appear to involve the following: enterprise cybersecurity digital credentials insurance-sector software. Digital identity could provide a broader strategic foundation. Distributed electricity and smart-city infrastructure represent intriguing longer-term possibilities. The biggest opportunity may not be any individual patent. It may be Jasmy's ability to combine several patented technologies into commercial platforms that serve multiple industries. For JASMY investors, the developments worth monitoring are confirmed customer adoption, recurring revenue, JasmyChain integration and measurable token usage. If Jasmy can connect these elements, its intellectual property could support a substantially broader business than the market currently associates with the JASMY token. Disclaimer: Independent research and commentary, not affiliated with Jasmy Corporation, JasmyLab or JANCTION. Commercial scenarios are hypothetical, not confirmed projects or partnerships. Patent records and possible applications do not establish commercial adoption, revenue or token demand. This article is not financial advice.

Most people know #Jasmy for its work in personal data protection, blockchain technology and the Internet of Things (IoT). But a patent application published in February 2026 reveals another potentially important area of development: technology that could help households and businesses manage, share and trade electricity using blockchain. Even more interestingly, Kazumasa Sato, a member of Jasmy's founding leadership, is named as one of the inventors. Could this eventually create another real-world use case for JASMY and create a potentially significant connection to #Remixpoint's energy business? First, when was the patent filed? The patent is officially titled AC-DC Power Conversion Device and Power System. Detail Information Patent publication WO2026028636A1 Company Jasmy Inc., Japan Original priority date 29 July 2024 International patent application filed 18 June 2025 Published internationally 5 February 2026 Inventors Nao Morita, Takashi Hagiwara and Kazumasa Sato Current status Pending — not yet granted An important distinction: This is not a patent invented or first filed in 2026. Its earliest claimed priority dates back to July 2024, its international application was filed in June 2025, and the application became publicly available in February 2026. Publication does not mean the patent has been granted. Original patent document: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2026028636A1/en What does the invention actually do? Imagine you have solar panels on your roof and a battery that stores the electricity they generate. During the day, your solar panels produce more electricity than you need. You store some in your battery, but you may still have electricity available. Meanwhile, another household nearby needs additional power to charge its electric vehicle. Now imagine technology that helps manage the electricity moving between connected systems and allows participants to agree on buying and selling electricity. That is one possible application described in Jasmy's patent. The invention has two particularly interesting elements. First, the electricity-management technology. The patent describes a device that uses sensors, an inverter and a battery to respond quickly when electricity demand changes. In simple terms, it helps control how much electricity flows through a system, even when someone suddenly switches on an appliance or electricity demand changes. This could be useful for homes, businesses, battery storage installations and smaller local electricity networks. Second, the blockchain application. The patent also describes how connected electricity systems could use blockchain to record electricity transactions. For example: One household offers to sell surplus electricity. Another household agrees to purchase it. A smart contract records the agreement. The system manages the electricity being supplied. Blockchain records how much electricity was actually delivered and received. The records could support payments, local digital coins or reward points. A smart contract is simply a computer program that automatically carries out agreed instructions when certain conditions are met. The important point is that blockchain could provide a shared, verifiable record of electricity transactions. This is a proposed application described in the patent, not an announcement that Jasmy has launched an electricity marketplace. Why could this be good for Jasmy? Imagine a smart city where hundreds or thousands of homes and businesses generate electricity through solar panels and store surplus energy in batteries. Rather than simply consuming electricity, each property could become both a buyer and a seller, sharing excess energy with others across a connected local network. Intelligent energy-management systems could coordinate the flow of electricity, while blockchain technology could securely record transactions, verify energy exchanges and support automated payments. Now imagine this infrastructure operating across entire residential developments, commercial precincts and eventually cities. This is where Jasmy's technology could become particularly relevant. Its patented energy-management technology could potentially support the physical movement of electricity, while blockchain could provide a trusted record of transactions. If #Jasmy commercialised this technology, it could generate revenue through licensing, software, equipment or ongoing services. If these systems were also integrated with #JasmyChain, the resulting network activity could create additional utility and demand for JASMY tokens. The broader opportunity is not simply electricity trading. It is the possibility of Jasmy contributing to the secure, interconnected infrastructure of future smart cities. If commercially successful, this could create new business opportunities involving: Residential solar and battery systems Local electricity networks Commercial energy management Smart electricity trading Blockchain-based transaction records Energy-related payment and reward systems These are potential applications, not confirmed commercial contracts. Why is Kazumasa Sato's involvement significant? One particularly interesting detail is that Kazumasa Sato is named as a co-inventor, alongside Nao Morita and Takashi Hagiwara. This matters because there is a difference between being an executive of a technology company and being recognised as an inventor on a patent application. An executive might oversee a project, approve funding or announce a new product without personally contributing to its invention. A named inventor is identified as having contributed to the inventive subject matter. Sato's inclusion therefore suggests direct technical involvement in the development of the invention. It is also interesting because the patent concerns electrical engineering and power-management systems, rather than only personal information protection. This suggests that Jasmy's technical development interests may extend across several industries. What does this have to do with the JASMY cryptocurrency? This is where we need to distinguish Jasmy the technology company from JASMY the cryptocurrency. A successful patent could help Jasmy Corporation develop products, licence technology or establish partnerships. But that does not automatically increase demand for JASMY tokens. For the token to benefit directly, Jasmy would need to connect the technology to its blockchain ecosystem in a way that creates genuine token utility. There are three possible outcomes. Scenario 1: Jasmy licences the electricity technology Scenario 2: Electricity transactions use JasmyChain Scenario 3: #JASMY becomes an essential part of an electricity marketplace Could this become a major opportunity? Potentially. Consider a future neighbourhood in which hundreds of households across Japan have solar panels and batteries. Each household could sometimes buy electricity and sometimes sell it. If #Jasmy supplied the technology, it could potentially earn revenue through equipment, software, licensing or ongoing services. If those systems also used #JasmyChain, network activity would increase exponentially. Final thoughts: Why this patent deserves attention Jasmy's energy patent is interesting because it points towards another possible application for the company's technology. It describes a physical electricity-control invention and a potential blockchain-supported system for recording and coordinating electricity transactions. The involvement of Kazumasa Sato and his co-inventors is also noteworthy because it demonstrates identifiable technical contributions associated with Jasmy. For now, this patent is a potentially important piece of Jasmy's longer-term technology story rather than proof of an immediate price catalyst. If Jasmy eventually announces an operational energy marketplace built on JasmyChain, with JASMY playing a defined economic role, that would be a much more significant development for token holders. Until then, the patent is worth watching, but its commercial and cryptocurrency implications remain possibilities rather than established outcomes. Source: International patent publication WO2026028636A1, AC-DC Power Conversion Device and Power System, published 5 February 2026. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2026028636A1/en Disclaimer: Jasmy Australia is an independent information platform and is not affiliated with Jasmy Corporation in Japan. This article is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Patent publication does not establish commercial adoption, profitability or future cryptocurrency performance.

Introduction This analysis is not intended to predict undisclosed #Jasmy partnerships, imply that negotiations are taking place, or present speculation as fact. It is a hypothesis. Its purpose is to examine #Jasmy’s existing corporate relationships, historical projects, technology partners and ecosystem connections and ask a more useful strategic question: If Jasmy successfully commercialises the technology it has already developed, which existing relationships could realistically evolve into larger deployments? That is the basis of this paper's featured table, demonstrating Jasmy's corporate connections. Jasmy has accumulated relationships across mobility, consumer electronics, enterprise IT, travel, sport, IoT, artificial intelligence, digital identity, distributed computing and environmental markets. However, simply assembling a list of well-known corporate names has limited analytical value. Why this exercise is increasingly relevant Several of #Jasmy’s earlier ideas may be more commercially relevant now than when they were originally introduced. The clearest example is the Personal Data Locker, or PDL. A few years ago, the concept of individuals retaining greater control over their personal data could appear abstract. The rapid growth of generative AI has changed that calculation. AI becomes more useful when it can understand a person’s financial history, purchasing behaviour, identity information, travel preferences, workplace activity, device data, subscriptions, mobility patterns and other personal information. That creates an increasingly important commercial question: How can an AI use highly personal information without requiring the user to permanently surrender control of that information to every platform providing an AI service? That problem is closely aligned with Jasmy’s PDL proposition. Jasmy’s current technology stack is also broader than the original IoT-focused proposition. For example: #JPKI-linked verification and identity services can potentially establish who the user is. #PDL Personal Data Locker can govern which information that person chooses to share and under what conditions. Personal AI, enterprise applications, mobility services, travel applications, sport and IoT systems can make use of authorised data. #JANCTION and distributed GPU infrastructure can provide computing resources for AI, rendering and other GPU-intensive applications. #JasmyChain can provide blockchain infrastructure for transactions, permissions, provenance or other Web3 functions. #JASMY could provide an economic layer where applications require gas, settlement, payments, staking, access fees or other recurring token-dependent activity. The strategic opportunity lies in connecting these components rather than treating each as an isolated product. That is also why Jasmy’s existing corporate relationships warrant closer examination. A company that originally collaborated with Jasmy around Secure PC, IoT or mobility may now have access to a broader technology stack involving AI, identity, blockchain and distributed computing. Existing relationships and plausible future outcomes Important: The outcomes below are analytical hypotheses only. They are not announced projects, rumours or claims that discussions are taking place. The plausibility assessment reflects technological fit, existing relationship strength and commercial logic, not the probability of an announcement. How to read the plausibility ratings Rating Meaning Very high Strong existing relationship or active technology pathway, clear commercial problem and a natural extension of Jasmy technology. High Strong technological and commercial logic, but the next step would require additional development, commercial agreement or integration. Medium-high Credible scenario with a logical strategic fit, although there is less current evidence of active expansion. Medium Technically realistic, but dependent on several assumptions or an older/weaker relationship. Medium-low Interesting technological overlap, but insufficient evidence to infer a meaningful current corporate pathway. The analytical distinction that matters The more important issue is whether there is a credible pathway from the relationship that already exists to a commercially meaningful future application. Each hypothesis in this analysis therefore considers five factors. Relationship strength considers whether there is a documented partnership, project, implementation, MOU, endorsement or historical technical collaboration. Technology fit considers whether Jasmy currently possesses technology that addresses a genuine problem within the partner’s business. Commercial logic considers whether the proposed outcome could generate measurable value for the participating companies or their customers. Strategic continuity considers whether the hypothetical development would be a logical extension of work that has already taken place rather than an unrelated leap. Scalability considers whether the use case could move beyond a demonstration or pilot into broader enterprise or consumer deployment. The plausibility rating should therefore not be interpreted as a forecast probability. A “very high” rating means the proposed outcome has a strong technological and strategic rationale based on what is already known. It does not mean that such an announcement is expected. That distinction is important when analysing Jasmy. Technology companies routinely conduct pilots, proof-of-concept projects and strategic collaborations that never develop into commercial-scale deployments. Relationships can become inactive. Corporate priorities can change. Internal procurement requirements can delay projects. Competing technology can emerge. A technically attractive product can still fail to satisfy commercial return-on-investment requirements. The table should therefore be read as a structured hypothesis map, not as a list of expected announcements. It deliberately separates existing evidence from future hypothesis. A company appearing in Jasmy's history does not mean that company is currently preparing another Jasmy deployment. Similarly, a strong technological fit does not establish that discussions are occurring. The more useful purpose of the table is to identify where three conditions overlap: an existing relationship or credible ecosystem connection, a business problem that Jasmy technology could address, and a commercially logical path from the current relationship to a larger application. That makes the table a strategic opportunity map, rather than a partnership prediction list. What the table reveals The strongest conclusion is that Jasmy may not need an entirely new collection of high-profile partners to create meaningful commercial growth. A more credible route may be to deepen relationships that already exist by introducing technologies that were either immature or unavailable when those relationships began. Some of Jasmy’s earlier collaborations focused on relatively narrow applications such as Secure PC, workplace monitoring, IoT or mobility. The technology stack is now considerably broader. PDL can potentially control personal information. JPKI-linked services can support verified identity. Personal AI can create a consumer-facing application for that information. JANCTION can provide distributed computing resources. Smart Render can provide a demonstrable GPU workload. JasmyChain can support blockchain functions. JASMY could potentially provide an economic mechanism where token-based activity is genuinely required. That changes the potential value of earlier relationships: An IoT relationship can potentially evolve into an IoT, PDL and AI proposition. A mobility relationship can potentially expand into vehicle identity, telematics, charging, insurance and user-controlled data. A contact-centre project can potentially become a privacy-controlled AI customer-service platform. A PC manufacturer could potentially produce a secure Personal AI device. A GPU demonstration could become a commercial distributed-compute network. The critical issue is whether Jasmy can turn these possibilities into integrated commercial products. The strongest strategic clusters Several relationship clusters appear particularly significant. Panasonic Advanced Technology, Smart Render and JANCTION This is arguably one of the clearest paths from technology development to commercial usage. Smart Render already demonstrates a practical reason to use distributed GPUs. Animation, VFX, architectural rendering, game development and other visual industries require substantial computing resources. If commercial customers begin paying to use this infrastructure, Jasmy would gain something more valuable than another partnership announcement: measurable network utilisation.. The larger opportunity would emerge if the same distributed-compute infrastructure expands beyond rendering into AI inference or other enterprise GPU workloads. AppBank and Personal AI AppBank could become strategically important because Personal AI provides a consumer application capable of making PDL meaningful. Personal data control has limited value if there is no useful application consuming the data. Money Twin provides a potential use case in which people may actually want to give an AI controlled access to financial and lifestyle information because they receive useful analysis in return. The missing component is high-quality authenticated data. A bank, card company, brokerage or insurer would therefore represent a logical next participant. This is one of the strongest hypothetical expansion paths because it creates a clear commercial relationship between identity, personal data and AI. transcosmos and enterprise AI The transcosmos relationship is potentially favourable. Generative AI is rapidly moving into customer service, but customer-service systems require access to some of the most sensitive information companies hold. A customer may need an AI agent to understand their identity, account history, transactions, previous complaints, purchases and preferences. The commercial problem is therefore not simply building an AI chatbot. The harder problem is deciding which information the AI is permitted to access and under what conditions. That creates a credible role for Jasmy’s PDL and Secure PC technologies. Mobility: Witz and Toyota-related history The original mobility work involving Witz and Toyota becomes more strategically interesting as vehicles become increasingly software-driven. Connected vehicles can generate location history, driving style, charging information, maintenance data, entertainment preferences and insurance-relevant information. The economic value of that data is considerable. The privacy issues are equally substantial. A system allowing drivers to selectively share different categories of data with manufacturers, insurers, charging networks or service centres would closely resemble Jasmy’s original data-sovereignty proposition. The important caveat is that the historical Toyota connection should not be presented as evidence of a current Toyota corporate partnership. Critical risks The table identifies plausible opportunities, but there are several reasons to remain cautious. Relationship inflation Crypto markets often overinterpret corporate associations. A pilot, MOU, conference demonstration, technology endorsement or historical collaboration should not automatically be treated as evidence of a current large-scale partnership. There is a major difference between a company that has previously worked with Jasmy and a company that currently deploys Jasmy technology commercially across a meaningful number of users or devices. That distinction should remain central to any serious analysis. Commercialisation risk Jasmy has developed a wide technology portfolio. That breadth creates opportunity, but it also creates execution risk. Secure PC, PDL, Smart Render, JANCTION, JasmyChain, carbon markets, Personal AI and digital identity all have different customers, competitors, sales cycles and regulatory environments. The company needs to demonstrate that these technologies can become repeatable commercial products rather than remaining a collection of individual projects. Integration risk The strongest version of the Jasmy thesis depends on integration. PDL becomes more valuable if Personal AI uses it. Personal AI becomes more valuable if verified financial, travel, mobility or consumer information can be accessed through it. Distributed computing becomes more strategically important if it processes these applications. JasmyChain becomes more valuable if those applications generate recurring blockchain activity. JASMY becomes more economically significant if this activity creates persistent token demand. If those components remain largely separate, the potential network effect is substantially weaker. Scale risk Pilot activity is not enough. Future evidence should increasingly focus on measurable indicators such as active users, enterprise customers, PDL accounts, GPU utilisation, paid workloads, revenue, JasmyChain transactions and the quantity of JASMY required by real applications. Without scale metrics, even high-quality partnerships remain difficult to value. Token-value capture risk This is arguably the most important issue for JASMY holders. Jasmy Corporation can succeed commercially without necessarily creating equivalent value for the JASMY token. A Secure PC licence can generate corporate revenue without requiring JASMY. A PDL application can potentially create commercial value without significant token consumption. A Personal AI service can attract users without necessarily producing meaningful blockchain activity. Investors therefore need to distinguish between: Jasmy Corporation business growth, Jasmy ecosystem usage, and JASMY token demand. They are related concepts, but they are not interchangeable. The strongest future developments would clearly establish why users or businesses need JASMY, how frequently they require it, how much is consumed or locked, and whether demand increases as network activity grows. I will watch this area closely and keep you updated. What would constitute a genuinely significant announcement? The market naturally responds to major corporate names. However, a prestigious new partner is not necessarily the most important development. An announcement saying that Jasmy has entered another strategic collaboration with a large company would be interesting, but it could still represent only an early-stage pilot. A substantially more important announcement would state that an existing enterprise partner has moved from pilot activity into commercial deployment at scale, with disclosed numbers of users, devices, transactions or workloads. It would become even more significant if that deployment explicitly required JasmyChain activity or recurring JASMY usage. That would connect corporate adoption, technology utilisation and token economics. Those are the three factors that ultimately matter most. Conclusion The central hypothesis emerging from this analysis is not that every company historically connected with Jasmy will ultimately adopt the full Jasmy ecosystem. That would be unrealistic. The stronger hypothesis is that Jasmy may already possess a sufficiently diverse network of relationships to provide multiple credible routes to commercialisation. For example; Panasonic Advanced Technology offers a pathway into distributed computing and industrial technology. AppBank offers a pathway into Personal AI. transcosmos offers a pathway into enterprise AI and customer-data governance. Witz and earlier Toyota-linked mobility work offer a pathway into connected vehicles and smart mobility. Aplix provides an IoT and embedded-device pathway. Nippon Travel Agency provides a potential travel and identity pathway. AVITA and NEXSTGO provide hardware distribution possibilities. Sagan Tosu provides a consumer-facing environment in which data, identity and token utility can potentially be tested together. Green Carbon and NCCX provide a pathway into blockchain-based environmental markets. The strategic opportunity lies in whether Jasmy can connect these relationships through a common architecture, rather than managing each as an isolated project. The strongest version of that architecture would use verified identity to establish who the user is, PDL to govern what information the user permits others to access, Personal AI or enterprise applications to create practical value from that information, distributed computing infrastructure to provide processing capacity, JasmyChain to support blockchain functions, and JASMY to provide an economic mechanism where recurring token usage is required. That remains a hypothesis. What would convert it into evidence is commercial execution. The most important signals to monitor are therefore not simply new corporate names. They are commercial deployments, repeat customers, expanding user numbers, measurable GPU utilisation, sustained JasmyChain activity, disclosed revenue and clearly defined JASMY utility. The most credible long-term investment thesis is therefore not that one transformational partnership will suddenly validate Jasmy. It is that Jasmy may be building a data-sovereignty infrastructure layer for AI, IoT and digital services, and that companies already within its orbit could provide the first real distribution channels for that infrastructure. The quality of that thesis will ultimately be determined by whether Jasmy can convert corporate relationships into commercial usage, commercial usage into network activity, and network activity into recurring economic demand for JASMY. Until that progression becomes measurable, the scenarios in this report should remain exactly what they are intended to be: informed hypotheses grounded in existing relationships and technological fit, rather than predictions of future announcements.

JasmyChain has made an important infrastructure update to its live mainnet, moving users and developers to a new official RPC endpoint under the JasmyScan domain. The new mainnet details are: RPC: rpc.jasmyscan.net Explorer: explorer.jasmyscan.net Chain ID: 680 The previous RPC endpoint using alt.technology may eventually become unavailable. At first glance, an RPC change can sound like a minor technical adjustment. But it matters because an RPC is one of the key gateways through which wallets, applications and developers interact with a blockchain. More importantly, this update appears to be another step in consolidating JasmyChain infrastructure under a recognisable Jasmy-branded ecosystem. It does not mean JasmyChain has only just launched. The mainnet was already operational. What it does show is continued development of the infrastructure surrounding the network. Why does an RPC matter? RPC stands for Remote Procedure Call. In simple terms, an RPC acts as a communication bridge between an application and a blockchain. When a wallet or decentralised application wants to ask JasmyChain something, such as: What is this wallet balance? Has this transaction been confirmed? What is the current block number? Send this transaction to the network. What tokens does this wallet hold? …it generally needs an RPC endpoint through which to communicate with the blockchain. This makes RPC infrastructure fundamental to the everyday operation of a blockchain ecosystem. 10 FAQs about the JasmyChain mainnet update 1. Has JasmyChain just launched its mainnet? No. JasmyChain was already live. This is an infrastructure update to the existing mainnet, rather than the launch of a new blockchain. 2. What exactly has changed? The official RPC endpoint has moved to: rpc.jasmyscan.net The official block explorer is: explorer.jasmyscan.net The network continues to use: Chain ID 680 The previous alt.technology RPC may eventually stop operating, so developers and users are being directed toward the new endpoint. 3. Why is this technically important? Applications, wallets and developers need reliable infrastructure to communicate with a blockchain. Moving to a new official RPC provides a clearer and more unified entry point into JasmyChain. It also places the RPC and explorer within the same JasmyScan-branded infrastructure environment. 4. Does this mean Jasmy now controls more of its own infrastructure? It indicates greater ecosystem consolidation, but it would be premature to conclude from a domain change alone that Jasmy has achieved complete infrastructure independence. What we can say is that users and developers are now being directed toward Jasmy-branded JasmyChain infrastructure rather than the previous third-party-branded endpoint. That is a meaningful distinction. 5. What is JasmyScan? JasmyScan is the blockchain explorer environment for JasmyChain. A blockchain explorer allows anyone to inspect what is happening on the network. Users can examine information including: transactions wallet addresses smart contracts token transfers blocks gas usage network activity This is particularly useful because it allows community members to verify activity directly rather than relying only on announcements or social-media claims. 6. Is JASMY actually used on JasmyChain? Yes. JASMY is the native gas token of JasmyChain. Gas is the fee paid to execute transactions and interact with smart contracts on the network. This gives JASMY a direct technical function within JasmyChain. That distinction matters. Many crypto projects announce partnerships or products without creating any direct requirement for their token. JasmyChain provides JASMY with an identifiable blockchain utility: network gas. 7. Does this automatically create substantial demand for JASMY? No. This is an important distinction. Having token utility does not automatically mean that utility is economically significant. The real question is: How much will JasmyChain actually be used? If transaction volume remains low, gas demand will also remain low. If JasmyChain eventually supports large numbers of applications, users and transactions, the role of JASMY as gas becomes considerably more significant. Therefore, infrastructure is only the foundation. Adoption is what gives the infrastructure economic meaning. 8. What is already developing around JasmyChain? JasmyChain is increasingly beginning to look like a broader blockchain ecosystem rather than simply a standalone network. Visible infrastructure and applications include: JasmyChain JasmyScan smart-contract infrastructure token transfers JASMY/WJASMY functionality swap infrastructure liquidity functionality MemePad and ecosystem applications Each component creates another potential reason for users or developers to interact with JasmyChain. The next question is whether those applications attract meaningful usage. 9. Is this bullish for JASMY? Yes, fFrom a fundamental infrastructure perspective, continued development is highly constructive. However, an RPC change by itself should not be confused with a major commercial adoption event. It does not automatically mean: millions of new users significant new revenue large transaction volumes substantial new JASMY demand an immediate price increase Those outcomes would require evidence. The significance of this update is therefore better understood as another piece of the infrastructure required before larger-scale adoption can occur. 10. What should JASMY holders watch next? This is arguably the most important question. The next stage should be assessed using measurable data rather than announcements alone. Key metrics include: daily transactions active wallet addresses new addresses smart-contract deployments verified contracts JASMY bridged onto JasmyChain swap volume liquidity gas consumption application launches active users developer activity commercial integrations If these metrics begin growing consistently, we would have stronger evidence that JasmyChain is moving from infrastructure development into meaningful adoption. Development Potential benefit Jasmy-branded RPC Creates a clearer and more unified JasmyChain infrastructure identity JasmyScan explorer Improves visibility and transparency of blockchain activity JASMY used as gas Gives JASMY a direct technical function within the network EVM compatibility Makes it easier for Ethereum-compatible developers and applications to interact with JasmyChain Swap infrastructure Enables on-chain token exchange and liquidity activity Smart-contract support Allows applications and decentralised services to operate directly on JasmyChain MemePad and ecosystem applications Creates additional reasons for users to interact with the network Chain ID 680 Provides JasmyChain with a distinct network identity Public blockchain data Allows users to independently verify transactions and activity Expanding infrastructure Provides the technical foundation required for future ecosystem growth Why the JASMY gas mechanism is especially important One of the most significant aspects of JasmyChain is the relationship between the blockchain and the JASMY token itself. JASMY is not merely displayed alongside the network. It performs a network function. When transactions occur on JasmyChain, JASMY is required for gas. Conceptually, the relationship looks like this: More applications → more users → more transactions → more gas usage → greater functional use of JASMY That does not mean every increase in transactions will materially affect market price. Gas fees can be extremely small, and the economic impact depends on the scale of network activity. Nevertheless, it creates an important mechanism connecting ecosystem adoption with token utility. From blockchain launch to ecosystem development The larger story may therefore not be the RPC update itself. It is the direction in which the pieces appear to be moving. Jasmy now has an increasingly visible collection of connected infrastructure: JasmyChain → JasmyScan → JASMY gas → smart contracts → swap → liquidity → ecosystem applications The transition worth watching is whether JasmyChain progresses from being technically operational to being actively used. That is a much higher bar. A functioning blockchain proves that the infrastructure exists. An active blockchain proves that people have reasons to use it. The next phase: watch the numbers The most useful way to evaluate JasmyChain from here is not simply to count announcements. It is to monitor measurable network activity. That means watching: Users. Transactions. Contracts. Volume. Liquidity. Gas consumption. Applications. If those indicators begin rising materially and consistently, the discussion around JasmyChain changes. It would no longer simply be: “Jasmy has built a blockchain.” It would increasingly become: “People are actually using it.” That is the distinction that matters. Summary The new JasmyChain RPC does not represent a new mainnet launch. Instead, it represents another stage in the development and consolidation of the existing JasmyChain infrastructure. The move toward JasmyScan-branded RPC and explorer infrastructure provides a clearer network environment for wallets, developers and users. The more consequential feature remains the use of JASMY as the native gas token. However, infrastructure alone does not establish adoption. The strongest evidence from here will come from measurable growth across transactions, users, smart contracts, liquidity, applications and gas consumption. For JasmyChain, the technology is increasingly visible. Now the key question is whether usage follows. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

A new BlackRock Digital Assets Research paper, The Machine-Native Economy, was released 21 hours ago, 23 September 2026. Whilst it does not mention #Jasmy, #JANCTION or #JasmyChain, its core thesis is strikingly relevant to the direction the Jasmy ecosystem appears to be pursuing through distributed GPU compute, Smart Render, data infrastructure and blockchain-based settlement. The paper argues that artificial intelligence is moving beyond simply generating text and images. Increasingly, AI systems may be able to find services, make decisions within their permissions, purchase data or computing capacity, and pay for those services automatically. This is the beginning of what BlackRock calls a “machine-native economy”. For #Jasmy holders, the useful question is not whether the paper is secretly about JASMY. It is not. The question is whether it describes the broader market in which JANCTION and Smart Render could eventually operate. And, it does. BlackRock’s paper says the next stage of AI may involve software that can do things for us, not just answer questions. For example, an AI assistant may eventually: find the cheapest GPU power to render a video rent that computing power automatically pay for it instantly receive the completed work without a person having to manage every step This creates a potential new economy where AI, payments and computer processing work together. That is relevant to Jasmy because #JANCTION and #SmartRender are aiming at a similar area. Smart Render is designed to use powerful GPUs (including connected idle GPUs) to do heavy video and image-rendering work outside a creator’s own computer. In simple terms: instead of your laptop struggling for hours to render a video, the job could be sent to a network of powerful computers and completed much faster. Where JASMY could fit is through JasmyChain. If applications such as Smart Render use JasmyChain and people need JASMY to pay network fees, then more genuine use of those applications could mean more ongoing use of JASMY. AI needs a way to pay BlackRock starts with a simple but powerful idea: “AI represents machine-native intelligence, while digital assets represent machine-native money.” (p. 2) In other words, AI can make decisions and perform tasks, while blockchain-based assets can move value according to programmable rules. Put those together and an AI agent could potentially request a service, pay for it and confirm delivery without the slow manual processes of traditional payment systems. The paper says that, as AI becomes more capable, it will need infrastructure designed for continuous, small-scale transactions: “Agentic commerce requires machine-native payment rails.” (p. 2) This matters because a future AI system may not make one large monthly payment. It may make thousands of tiny payments for data, API calls, model usage, storage or GPU compute. BlackRock describes blockchains as particularly suited to: “High-frequency, sub-cent, machine-to-machine (M2M) transactions.” (p. 5) That is a meaningful conceptual fit with JasmyChain’s role as an L2 where JASMY is used as custom gas. If real applications make frequent on-chain transactions, the chain needs a mechanism to pay for them. The important part, however, is the word real. A gas token only gains durable utility if people and applications actually use the network. The clearest link: distributed GPU compute The strongest connection is #BlackRock’s focus on compute as an emerging digital-asset market. “Compute is emerging as a new and potentially large market for digital assets.” (p. 2) This is very close to the opportunity behind #JANCTION and Smart Render. Smart Render has been described as a distributed rendering application that uses company-owned GPUs alongside connected idle GPUs, with work allocated across the network. Its immediate use case is rendering video and high-precision Blender files, so creators can offload demanding processing from their own computers. BlackRock’s broader argument is that computing power is becoming an economic resource in its own right: “Compute is becoming a distinct, large, and increasingly investable economic resource.” (p. 7) The paper is not describing one specific project or saying that distributed GPU networks will automatically succeed. It is saying that, as AI demand grows, the market will need better ways to price, allocate, finance and pay for computing capacity. That is the big-picture opportunity for JANCTION: not merely “crypto plus AI”, but a useful marketplace where people or software can access compute when they need it. What a functioning network could look like BlackRock envisages agents that can examine available compute capacity and choose the best option for a particular task: “Agents could query real-time marketplace APIs to compare available capacity by price, performance, latency, location, and hardware specialization.” (p. 9) Imagine a creator needing to render a complex animation, or an AI tool requiring short-term GPU power. Instead of manually researching cloud providers, the software could compare available capacity across a network and select a suitable provider. The paper then describes the desired outcome: “This framework could enable elastic, just-in-time access to compute with limited human intervention.” (p. 9) That is precisely why #SmartRender’s operational testing is more important than vague AI marketing. If it can demonstrate that work is actually distributed, completed reliably, stored safely and paid for economically, it begins to prove a practical use case. The company’s claimed 94% reduction in rendering time during internal verification is promising, but it remains an internal result until independent or user-level evidence shows how the service performs at scale. Where JASMY could fit, and what must still be proven BlackRock notes that programmable payment tools could support settlement: “On-demand settlement on a per-use, per-model-token, or per-job basis.” (p. 9) For Jasmy, this is the key economic question: could JASMY become necessary within an active ecosystem of compute jobs, storage, data services or other applications? If #JANCTION applications use #JasmyChain and transactions require #JASMY for gas, then increased application activity should generate increased token usage at the network level. But that alone does not tell us how much value will accrue to JASMY holders. The outcome depends on the fee model, gas pricing, token circulation, any subsidies, the number of users and whether activity is genuine rather than test or promotional traffic. BlackRock itself gives the right caution: “The ecosystem remains nascent, with agentic payment activity and compute-market liquidity still limited.” (p. 10) This means the whole area is still very early and not yet widely used. “Ecosystem remains nascent”: the technology, businesses and users are still developing. “Agentic payment activity”: AI agents are not yet routinely making lots of real automated payments for services, data or compute. “Compute-market liquidity still limited”: there are not yet large, easy-to-use markets where people can reliably buy, sell or trade spare GPU/computing power at transparent prices. For JANCTION/Smart Render: the idea is promising, but the market is not mature yet. The proof will be real customers submitting real rendering jobs and providers reliably supplying GPU capacity. That applies squarely here. The opportunity is real, but early. Smart Render is an operational product in testing, not yet evidence of a large and liquid compute marketplace. Why this is still worth watching The paper’s conclusion captures the larger theme: “AI and blockchain-based digital assets are increasingly converging as machines take a greater role in economic activity.” (p. 10) Jasmy’s relevance lies in whether it can turn that convergence into practical services: secure data handling, identity, distributed compute, creator tools and an accessible payment layer. The most constructive way to view #JANCTION and #SmartRender is not as a guaranteed price catalyst, but as a potential pathway to measurable utility. The milestones worth watching are clear: public access to Smart Render and other JANCTION applications real customer or creator usage transparent job, user and revenue metrics evidence that the #GPU network is reliable and economically competitive clarity on when and how #JASMY is used in the application flow sustained JasmyChain activity beyond testing BlackRock’s paper does not validate JASMY as an investment. What it does validate is the relevance of the problem space: AI needs compute, compute needs efficient allocation, and automated systems may increasingly need programmable settlement. If #JANCTION can execute on that vision, it would be operating in exactly the kind of machine-native economy BlackRock believes is beginning to form.

For years, Jasmy’s Personal Data Locker (PDL) has been relatively easy to understand: give individuals a secure environment in which they can control their personal data rather than allowing that data to remain exclusively under the control of large platforms. But a post by Jasmy CFO Hara on 7 July 2026 raises a potentially much bigger idea. Discussing the secure storage of point-cloud data, Hara acknowledged that #Jasmy may have focused too heavily on aggregating data into the PDL. He then suggested another approach: data could remain external but be accessible when required, with Jasmy positioned as a “platform for connecting to external data.” This may sound like a technical refinement. But, it represents a significant evolution in Jasmy’s data architecture. Instead of bringing all the data to Jasmy, Jasmy could potentially become the secure connection between the user, their data and the applications that need it. The evolution in one view The importance of this progression becomes clearer when we return to some of #Jasmy’s earlier work with artificial intelligence and personal data. 2021: Jasmy and Koozyt were already thinking about AI differently In March 2021, Jasmy and Koozyt announced joint work on an application framework provisionally called the KJ Engine. The underlying idea was remarkably relevant to today's AI environment. Internet searches, social media, games, devices and other digital services continuously generate information about people's interests and behaviour. AI can analyse these interactions and discover characteristics about an individual that the person may not even consciously recognise. Normally, those insights are extremely valuable to the company collecting the data. They can be used for advertising, personalisation, product development and other commercial purposes. Jasmy and Koozyt approached the problem differently. They asked whether those AI-derived characteristics could instead be made visible to the individual, helping that person understand their own behaviour and potentially use those insights for decision-making and wellbeing. The objective was not simply to prevent information from being analysed. It was to explore whether the individual could become the beneficiary of the intelligence derived from their own data. But that immediately creates another problem. Personal data does not live in one place Think about how fragmented a person's digital life is. Shopping information may reside with Amazon or Rakuten. Exercise information may reside with a wearable provider. Vehicle information may sit with a manufacturer. Smartphone information exists across multiple applications. Other data can reside in government, enterprise, IoT, financial, entertainment or creator platforms. So one person may generate valuable information across dozens—or eventually hundreds—of independent systems. That creates a fundamental architectural question: How does Jasmy use distributed personal data without simply creating another giant centralised database? Jasmy’s 2022 experiments help illustrate the difficulty. 2022: #Amazon and #Rakuten demonstrated both the opportunity and the limitation Jasmy’s Interest AI experiment used participants’ Amazon and Rakuten purchase histories to analyse their interests. The important detail is how Jasmy obtained the information. Jasmy did not simply connect directly to Amazon or Rakuten and retrieve purchase histories. Participants obtained their own purchase-history information. Jasmy provided a processing method to prepare the information, after which the data could be supplied to the Jasmy environment for analysis. This demonstrated something important. External personal data could be combined with AI to produce something useful for the individual. But it also exposed a practical limitation. If every new data source requires information to be downloaded, processed, copied and transferred into another environment, scaling the model becomes considerably more difficult. Imagine repeating this not just with Amazon and Rakuten, but with shopping, vehicles, health devices, IoT systems, creator platforms, business systems and enormous machine-generated datasets. That brings us to Hara’s July 2026 post. 2026: Hara questions the original assumption On 7 July 2026, Hara discussed a conversation about how companies and individuals could securely store point-cloud data. The key section translates approximately as: “Jasmy may have been focusing a little too heavily on the concept of aggregating data into the PDL.” He then raised another possibility: “External data that can be accessed at any time.” And, importantly: “A platform for connecting to external data.” That changes the question. Instead of asking: How do we move external data into the PDL? Jasmy can potentially ask: How does the PDL securely connect to data wherever it already resides? That is potentially much more scalable. From Personal Data Locker to Personal Data Hub The change sounds small, but it is strategically important. Old emphasis: Keep my data here. Emerging emphasis: Control my data from here. The PDL therefore potentially becomes less about being the destination for every piece of information and more about being the control point through which distributed information can be accessed. Why point-cloud data is an important clue The context of Hara’s post matters. He was discussing point-cloud data. Point clouds are large three-dimensional datasets that can digitally represent objects, buildings, cities and physical environments. They can be generated by LiDAR, cameras and other sensing technologies and are relevant to fields including digital twins, robotics, autonomous systems, construction, mapping and spatial computing. These datasets can become enormous. Moving and duplicating an entire dataset simply because another application needs to perform a task with it can be inefficient. And that principle is not restricted to point clouds. The same architecture could potentially apply to IoT sensors, vehicles, personal devices, enterprise systems, creator platforms and many other sources. Why AI makes this much more important AI changes the significance of this architecture. Modern AI systems need data, but they do not necessarily need to own or permanently store every underlying dataset. They need the right information, with the appropriate permission, at the appropriate time. Imagine an AI application attempting to provide a personalised service. Relevant information might sit across shopping platforms, devices, IoT systems, location services, enterprise systems, creator platforms and personal preference data. Instead of moving all of that information into one central repository, a different architecture becomes possible. This changes how we might think about the value of a PDL. The important question may no longer be: How much data does the PDL store? A more important question could become: How much useful data can the PDL securely connect, permission and make available to authorised applications? That is a substantially broader proposition. This takes us back to KJ Engine This is why the original Koozyt collaboration deserves another look. Koozyt and Jasmy’s 2021 proposal involved analysing interactions between people and multiple external “social devices.” The objective was to use AI to discover behavioural characteristics and return useful insights to the individual. But accomplishing that at scale inherently requires access to distributed information. Five years later, Hara is explicitly discussing a PDL architecture that could connect to externally held data rather than requiring everything to be accumulated internally. That does not prove that Hara’s 2026 proposal is a direct continuation of KJ Engine. But the technological progression is coherent. Seen this way, Hara’s comments do not necessarily represent a retreat from the original PDL idea. They may represent an attempt to remove one of its architectural limitations. From data ownership to data orchestration Jasmy’s original philosophy can broadly be summarised as: Your data should belong to you. But ownership alone does not make data useful. The emerging model potentially extends the philosophy. This begins to look less like simple data storage and more like data orchestration. And that distinction could become increasingly important as AI agents and applications require access to information spread across many different systems. Where could JasmyChain fit? There is an obvious question for anyone following Jasmy today: Where does JasmyChain fit into this architecture? Conceptually, blockchain infrastructure could potentially provide functions such as verification, transactions, permissions, auditability or economic settlement. Eventually one could imagine: External Data → PDL → AI / Applications → JasmyChain → JASMY But this is where evidence becomes essential. Hara’s July post does not establish that JasmyChain currently implements this entire architecture. Nor does the historical KJ Engine work prove that Smart Render or today’s creator initiatives are direct descendants of that project. Those connections still need to be demonstrated technically. And that may now be one of the most important areas for the Jasmy community to investigate. Why Hara’s post matters Hara did not announce a new blockchain. He did not announce a huge commercial partnership. He did not announce new JASMY token utility. Instead, he questioned something more fundamental: Why must the data come to Jasmy at all? That single question potentially changes the architecture from simple data storage into a broader system of ownership, control, connection, authorised AI use and potential value creation. In an AI economy, that could become considerably more important than simply building another repository for information. Jasmy began with the proposition: Your data should belong to you. KJ Engine explored whether AI could help individuals understand and benefit from that data. Interest AI demonstrated how external behavioural data could actually be analysed. And now Hara is questioning whether that external information even needs to be moved into the PDL in the first place. That gives us a remarkably clean progression: OWN IT → UNDERSTAND IT → CONTROL IT → CONNECT IT → CREATE VALUE FROM IT Perhaps that is the most important implication of Hara’s July 2026 post. The Personal Data Locker may ultimately become less about the locker, and much more about the key. Resources Date: 7 July 2026, 20:23 Japan time. Translation: We had a constructive discussion about how companies and individuals can securely store point-cloud data. Jasmy may have been focusing a little too heavily on the concept of aggregating data into the PDL. We are also considering positioning it as “external data that can be accessed at any time” and as a “platform for connecting to external data.” #JASMY #PDL #datahub The key phrase is the final one: “platform for connecting to external data.” That is the part that supports the idea of the PDL evolving from mainly a storage destination into more of a secure access and connection layer. 17 March 2021 — Jasmy × Koozyt announce joint development of the KJ Engine, combining blockchain and AI to return personalised behavioural insights to the individual. This image comes from the original Jasmy × Koozyt announcement dated 17 March 2021. It announced that the two companies had begun joint R&D and were considering proof-of-concept testing for what they called the “KJ Engine” (provisional name). English translation Koozyt × Jasmy Currently, in areas such as internet search, social media and social games, unconscious characteristic data relating to users’ interests and behaviour is continuously learned through advances in AI data-analysis technology as users interact with individual services and applications. This data is then used for a variety of purposes, including improving service quality and functionality and delivering targeted advertising. In order for the relationship between people and society not to become distorted, and for people to live happily and experience well-being, could these unconscious characteristics be visualised in a form that users can appropriately recognise, helping them notice those characteristics, bring them into conscious awareness and use them for metacognition? If we provisionally call devices placed within society that act as hubs for interaction between people and society “social devices,” then the unconscious characteristic data extracted from interaction data between people and those social devices is extremely important personal data. We believe that this data should securely belong to the individual, while services and applications should be able to use it appropriately, both consciously and unconsciously. Based on this awareness of the issue, Jasmy and Koozyt have decided to combine rapidly developing blockchain technology and AI data-science technology. Through mining interaction data between people and social devices, they aim to personalise data characteristics derived at an unconscious level, and then visualise those characteristics in a recognisable form so that people can use them for their own well-being and as support for decision-making. To achieve this, they began development of an application framework provisionally called “KJ Engine.” Why the date matters This is not a new 2026 Jasmy development. The concept dates back to 17 March 2021. But the direction has changed from 7 July 2026. It is significant historically because it shows that several themes #Jasmy is discussing today — personal ownership of data, AI analysis, blockchain, personalised data, conscious/unconscious behavioural signals and decision-support applications — were already part of its architecture more than five years ago. Jasmy later confirmed in February 2022 that KJ Engine had continued in development and was being taken toward practical use through its “Platinum Data Happiness Discovery Project,” involving the Personal Data Locker and rewards in JasmyCoin. In summary, on 7 July 2026, Hara is explicitly describing a #PDL architecture that could connect to externally held data, using #AI, rather than requiring everything to be accumulated internally. This article distinguishes documented Jasmy/Koozyt concepts and Hara’s July 2026 comments from potential future architecture. Connections to JasmyChain, Smart Render and JASMY utility should not be treated as confirmed until supported by technical or official evidence. This is not financial advice.

Something potentially very significant has appeared on Remixpoint's DEEPPOINT. But first, remember what Hiroshi Harada, Hara, has already told us. Hara on JASMY + JPYD In 2026, Hara made the relationship remarkably clear: “As a custom gas token, $JASMY will serve as the base currency for corporate token issuance and $JPYD (stablecoin).” He then described the bigger objective: “The two ecosystems will interact with each other, aiming to expand their influence.” And put Jasmy's technology at the centre: “Of course, the center of the #JASMY ecosystem is Jasmy #PDL.” That PDL, he said, was evolving into: “the #SuperWallet (tentative name), a versatile authentication tool.” Most bullishly: “Major development preparations are already complete.” Read those statements together. JASMY + JPYD + corporate tokens + PDL + SuperWallet + JasmyChain + JANCTION. This is an ecosystem. And Hara had been signalling JPYD for years Back in August 2024, Hara said: “We've also recently acquired the trademark for JPYD.” And then: “We hope to use this as a new common currency.” Jasmy's payment vision was also described around this period as: “a payment system for the wallet that combines a point system with a stablecoin.” So the stablecoin component isn't a new theory created by the community. They told us about it. Now look at DEEPPOINT Fast-forward to today. Remixpoint's DEEPPOINT is mapping Japan's emerging yen-stablecoin market. And sitting alongside the other Japanese stablecoin projects is: JPYD Network — Coming Soon That immediately caught my attention. Why? Because Hara is also a director of Remixpoint and heads its Digital Asset Management Division. So connect the dots: Hara / Jasmy - JASMY + JPYD + PDL + SuperWallet Hara / JANCTION - Interacting ecosystem + compute infrastructure Hara / Remixpoint - Director + Digital Asset Management Remixpoint / DEEPPOINT - Tracking Japan's emerging stablecoin infrastructure DEEPPOINT and JPYD — Coming Soon That's a pretty big link. Why could JPYD matter so much to JASMY? Because JASMY and JPYD don't need to compete. They could do different jobs. JASMY - Gas + ecosystem utility + corporate-token base currency JPYD - Stable yen-denominated payment and settlement PDL / SuperWallet - Identity + authentication + personal data JasmyChain - Blockchain infrastructure JANCTION - Compute + GPU + AI infrastructure Put it together: IDENTITY + DATA + COMPUTE + BLOCKCHAIN + TOKENISATION + PAYMENTS That is a very different proposition from simply asking: “When will JASMY pump?” The bigger question is whether we are watching the infrastructure for an actual digital economy being assembled piece by piece. The link I am watching None of this proves that Remixpoint will issue JPYD. It doesn't yet prove JPYD will launch on JasmyChain. But this part is factual: Hara has explicitly linked JASMY with JPYD. Hara has described JPYD as a stablecoin. Hara has said JASMY will serve as a base currency for JPYD. Hara is a director of Remixpoint. Remixpoint operates DEEPPOINT. DEEPPOINT now tracks JPYD as “Coming Soon”. For me, that's no longer a connection worth ignoring. $JASMY → JPYD → JASMYCHAIN → SUPERWALLET → JANCTION If those pieces ultimately connect in production, JASMY's role could be considerably bigger than the market currently appreciates. And Hara may have already told us exactly where this is heading. Disclaimer: JPYD's final technical architecture, issuer and blockchain deployment have not yet been confirmed. My article distinguishes confirmed public statements from possible future integration and is not financial advice. #Jasmy #JPYD #Jasmychain #Superwallet #Janction #Deeppoint