14 October 2026 An intriguing concept shared by Kyohei (@kyohei_nft), associated with #Jasmy Group's #DEEPPOINT, #SmartRender and #PDL initiatives, explores a different approach to digital advertising. Yesterday, Kyohei posted on X the following: あらゆるUI要素をLiquid Grass化することで、ページのbackground全体を広告枠にする邪法デザインパターンを思い付いた X translation to English: I came up with a nefarious design pattern that turns the entire page background into an ad space by converting every UI element into Liquid Grass. Kyohei also posted the following: これ有用かもしれない。インフルエンサーとのコラボや、協賛企業のPV再生など。 X translation to English: This might be useful. Collaborations with influencers, or PV plays from sponsoring companies, etc. What if the entire website became the advertisement, rather than simply displaying advertisements? What is the concept? Kyohei proposes transforming webpage elements into translucent, Liquid Glass-style components, allowing advertising imagery to occupy the entire background. Buttons, menus and content panels remain functional while a sponsor's branding becomes part of the overall visual experience. Essentially, the website itself becomes advertising space. Has this been done before? Similar concepts exist, including Spotify homepage takeovers, website skins and immersive advertising. However, Kyohei's approach could be different because the interface itself becomes visually integrated with the advertising. The distinction is between advertising around website content and advertising through the website's visual design. It is brilliant and incredibly innovative. What are the commercial benefits? The concept creates several potential opportunities: Influencer collaborations: Brands sponsor an influencer's entire website appearance Corporate sponsorship: Companies purchase exclusive branded website experiences Product launches: Websites temporarily adopt promotional themes Sponsored page views: Publishers potentially generate premium advertising revenue Dynamic campaigns: Advertising backgrounds change according to sponsors or promotional periods The commercial attraction is increased brand visibility without relying exclusively on conventional advertising placements. Could this generate meaningful revenue? Potentially. Consider a website generating 500,000 monthly page views, then consider the potential advertising rates. This is hypothetical, but demonstrates how an immersive sponsorship model could create an additional revenue stream. Actual revenue would depend on advertiser demand, audience engagement and campaign performance. What are the challenges? Transparency must not compromise readability, navigation or accessibility. Sponsored experiences would also require clear advertising disclosure. The objective would be to create an immersive advertising environment without disrupting the website's functionality or user experience. Why is this interesting for Jasmy? #Kyohei's involvement with DEEPPOINT, SmartRender and PDL makes the concept particularly interesting to followers of the broader #Jasmy ecosystem. Potential future applications could involve digital content, creator monetisation and privacy-conscious advertising. Whilst no direct integration with JasmyChain, PDL or the JASMY token has been confirmed, the concept demonstrates the intelligence and innovative minds of the Jasmy team, in particular Kyohei. What happens next? The important developments to watch would be a working demonstration, advertiser partnerships and evidence of commercial adoption. If the concept can be implemented across multiple websites, it could potentially develop into a reusable advertising platform. Final thoughts #Kyohei's experiment challenges a fundamental assumption of digital advertising: that advertisements need their own designated space. Instead, it proposes that websites themselves became the advertising medium? It is an interesting idea with potential applications for influencers, publishers and corporate sponsors. Whether it becomes commercially significant remains to be seen, but it is another creative development worth watching within the wider Jasmy ecosystem. Original concept: へいきょ | Kyohei (@kyohei_nft). Commercial scenarios and potential Jasmy integrations are speculative, not confirmed announcements.

How #Jasmy could combine its patented technologies to create new opportunities in digital identity, cybersecurity, smart cities, energy infrastructure and enterprise services. Most people associate Jasmy with cryptocurrency, Personal Data Locker #PDL, Secure PC and #JasmyChain. However, examining Jasmy's patents collectively reveals something potentially much more significant. Rather than developing isolated technologies, Jasmy may have the building blocks for interconnected commercial ecosystems. Its patented inventions cover the following areas: personal information management identity verification biometric authentication cryptographic security blockchain records distributed electricity systems. By combining these technologies, Jasmy could enter several substantial markets.The following table presents 12 possible commercial scenarios, ranked by their potential strategic and commercial significance. Rank Commercial scenario Patented technologies combined Potential application Revenue opportunities Potential JASMY impact 1 National digital identity platform PDL + biometric authentication + encrypted data sharing Secure identity verification across banking, insurance, employment and government services Verification fees, subscriptions, licensing Blockchain identity transactions 2 Smart cities powered by Jasmy Electricity management + IoT security + blockchain records Smart buildings, solar networks, batteries and coordinated electricity exchanges Infrastructure licensing, energy software, transaction services Blockchain energy transactions 3 National employee credentials platform PDL + identity verification + encrypted credentials Portable qualifications, employment records and professional licences Employer subscriptions, credential verification fees On-chain credential records 4 Secure financial identity network PDL + biometrics + cryptographic security Customer identity verification, secure financial access and audit records Banking software, authentication licensing Verification and audit transactions 5 Integrated insurance technology Secure PC + PDL + employee credentials Combined insurance staff accreditation, cybersecurity and information management Recurring SaaS subscriptions, enterprise contracts Credential and security transactions 6 Smart solar neighbourhoods Electricity exchange + battery controls + blockchain Coordinated household solar generation, battery storage and electricity transfers Energy management subscriptions, transaction services Electricity-related network activity 7 Enterprise cybersecurity ecosystem Secure PC + biometric authentication + application cryptography Secure employee devices, applications and enterprise information Per-device licensing, managed security services Blockchain security records 8 Healthcare information network PDL + identity verification + encrypted sharing Patient-controlled medical information exchange Healthcare software licensing, subscriptions Consent and verification transactions 9 Industrial IoT security network Device cryptography + blockchain records Secure connected equipment, factories and infrastructure Device licensing, industrial cybersecurity High-volume device transactions 10 Global professional digital passport PDL + biometric identity + encrypted credentials International verification of professional qualifications Credential fees, licensing, employer subscriptions Blockchain credential verification 11 Energy compliance platform Blockchain energy records + secure IoT + electricity management Verifiable electricity generation, consumption and transfer records Compliance software, auditing, licensing Energy audit transactions 12 Global privacy technology platform PDL + biometric authentication + international patent rights Licensing privacy and authentication technology internationally Licensing, enterprise subscriptions, partnerships Potential international JasmyChain usage These are hypothetical applications based on published patent technologies, not confirmed Jasmy commercial projects. Potential JASMY impacts depend on actual JasmyChain integration. Which opportunities are most promising? Opportunity Commercial potential Near-term feasibility Why it matters Digital identity Very high Medium Broad applications across regulated industries Smart cities and energy Very high Low Potential expansion into physical infrastructure Employee credentials High High Builds on Jasmy Skill Management Financial identity Very high Medium Large market for secure authentication Insurance technology High High Combines existing commercial offerings Solar neighbourhoods Very high Low New distributed-energy market Enterprise cybersecurity High High Potential recurring software revenue Healthcare data Very high Low–medium Sensitive-data management at scale Industrial IoT High Medium Potentially large connected-device networks Professional credentials High Medium–high Portable, verifiable qualifications Energy compliance High Low–medium Auditable energy transaction records Global privacy licensing Very high Medium–low International commercial scalability The three combinations that stand out 1. Digital identity, Personal Data Locker and biometrics This combination has the strongest connection to Jasmy's established personal-data strategy. It could support services where individuals securely verify their identity or credentials without unnecessarily exposing sensitive information. 2. Distributed electricity, secure IoT and blockchain Jasmy's published energy-related patent application, WO2026028636A1, makes this particularly interesting. Combining electricity management with secure connected devices and blockchain records could create opportunities in solar communities, energy infrastructure and smart cities. 3. Secure PC, employee credentials and insurance services This may offer the clearest near-term commercial pathway. Jasmy already offers Secure PC and launched Jasmy Skill Management in October 2026. Combining these capabilities could strengthen enterprise subscriptions and create opportunities for additional services. What could this mean for JASMY? The distinction between corporate revenue and token demand is essential. Jasmy could earn revenue through software subscriptions, licensing and enterprise contracts without necessarily creating significant demand for JASMY. However, JasmyChain uses JASMY as its gas token. If future commercial platforms require JasmyChain for verification, credential records, device security or energy transactions, genuine adoption could increase network activity. For example, a hypothetical platform with one million users completing 10 blockchain transactions monthly would generate 120 million transactions annually. That would represent substantial network usage, although the financial effect on JASMY would depend on gas fees, token economics and actual transaction requirements. Conclusion: An interconnected technology ecosystem Jasmy's patents suggest technological capabilities extending well beyond its cryptocurrency identity. The most commercially immediate opportunities appear to involve the following: enterprise cybersecurity digital credentials insurance-sector software. Digital identity could provide a broader strategic foundation. Distributed electricity and smart-city infrastructure represent intriguing longer-term possibilities. The biggest opportunity may not be any individual patent. It may be Jasmy's ability to combine several patented technologies into commercial platforms that serve multiple industries. For JASMY investors, the developments worth monitoring are confirmed customer adoption, recurring revenue, JasmyChain integration and measurable token usage. If Jasmy can connect these elements, its intellectual property could support a substantially broader business than the market currently associates with the JASMY token. Disclaimer: Independent research and commentary, not affiliated with Jasmy Corporation, JasmyLab or JANCTION. Commercial scenarios are hypothetical, not confirmed projects or partnerships. Patent records and possible applications do not establish commercial adoption, revenue or token demand. This article is not financial advice.

Most people know #Jasmy for its work in personal data protection, blockchain technology and the Internet of Things (IoT). But a patent application published in February 2026 reveals another potentially important area of development: technology that could help households and businesses manage, share and trade electricity using blockchain. Even more interestingly, Kazumasa Sato, a member of Jasmy's founding leadership, is named as one of the inventors. Could this eventually create another real-world use case for JASMY and create a potentially significant connection to #Remixpoint's energy business? First, when was the patent filed? The patent is officially titled AC-DC Power Conversion Device and Power System. Detail Information Patent publication WO2026028636A1 Company Jasmy Inc., Japan Original priority date 29 July 2024 International patent application filed 18 June 2025 Published internationally 5 February 2026 Inventors Nao Morita, Takashi Hagiwara and Kazumasa Sato Current status Pending — not yet granted An important distinction: This is not a patent invented or first filed in 2026. Its earliest claimed priority dates back to July 2024, its international application was filed in June 2025, and the application became publicly available in February 2026. Publication does not mean the patent has been granted. Original patent document: https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2026028636A1/en What does the invention actually do? Imagine you have solar panels on your roof and a battery that stores the electricity they generate. During the day, your solar panels produce more electricity than you need. You store some in your battery, but you may still have electricity available. Meanwhile, another household nearby needs additional power to charge its electric vehicle. Now imagine technology that helps manage the electricity moving between connected systems and allows participants to agree on buying and selling electricity. That is one possible application described in Jasmy's patent. The invention has two particularly interesting elements. First, the electricity-management technology. The patent describes a device that uses sensors, an inverter and a battery to respond quickly when electricity demand changes. In simple terms, it helps control how much electricity flows through a system, even when someone suddenly switches on an appliance or electricity demand changes. This could be useful for homes, businesses, battery storage installations and smaller local electricity networks. Second, the blockchain application. The patent also describes how connected electricity systems could use blockchain to record electricity transactions. For example: One household offers to sell surplus electricity. Another household agrees to purchase it. A smart contract records the agreement. The system manages the electricity being supplied. Blockchain records how much electricity was actually delivered and received. The records could support payments, local digital coins or reward points. A smart contract is simply a computer program that automatically carries out agreed instructions when certain conditions are met. The important point is that blockchain could provide a shared, verifiable record of electricity transactions. This is a proposed application described in the patent, not an announcement that Jasmy has launched an electricity marketplace. Why could this be good for Jasmy? Imagine a smart city where hundreds or thousands of homes and businesses generate electricity through solar panels and store surplus energy in batteries. Rather than simply consuming electricity, each property could become both a buyer and a seller, sharing excess energy with others across a connected local network. Intelligent energy-management systems could coordinate the flow of electricity, while blockchain technology could securely record transactions, verify energy exchanges and support automated payments. Now imagine this infrastructure operating across entire residential developments, commercial precincts and eventually cities. This is where Jasmy's technology could become particularly relevant. Its patented energy-management technology could potentially support the physical movement of electricity, while blockchain could provide a trusted record of transactions. If #Jasmy commercialised this technology, it could generate revenue through licensing, software, equipment or ongoing services. If these systems were also integrated with #JasmyChain, the resulting network activity could create additional utility and demand for JASMY tokens. The broader opportunity is not simply electricity trading. It is the possibility of Jasmy contributing to the secure, interconnected infrastructure of future smart cities. If commercially successful, this could create new business opportunities involving: Residential solar and battery systems Local electricity networks Commercial energy management Smart electricity trading Blockchain-based transaction records Energy-related payment and reward systems These are potential applications, not confirmed commercial contracts. Why is Kazumasa Sato's involvement significant? One particularly interesting detail is that Kazumasa Sato is named as a co-inventor, alongside Nao Morita and Takashi Hagiwara. This matters because there is a difference between being an executive of a technology company and being recognised as an inventor on a patent application. An executive might oversee a project, approve funding or announce a new product without personally contributing to its invention. A named inventor is identified as having contributed to the inventive subject matter. Sato's inclusion therefore suggests direct technical involvement in the development of the invention. It is also interesting because the patent concerns electrical engineering and power-management systems, rather than only personal information protection. This suggests that Jasmy's technical development interests may extend across several industries. What does this have to do with the JASMY cryptocurrency? This is where we need to distinguish Jasmy the technology company from JASMY the cryptocurrency. A successful patent could help Jasmy Corporation develop products, licence technology or establish partnerships. But that does not automatically increase demand for JASMY tokens. For the token to benefit directly, Jasmy would need to connect the technology to its blockchain ecosystem in a way that creates genuine token utility. There are three possible outcomes. Scenario 1: Jasmy licences the electricity technology Scenario 2: Electricity transactions use JasmyChain Scenario 3: #JASMY becomes an essential part of an electricity marketplace Could this become a major opportunity? Potentially. Consider a future neighbourhood in which hundreds of households across Japan have solar panels and batteries. Each household could sometimes buy electricity and sometimes sell it. If #Jasmy supplied the technology, it could potentially earn revenue through equipment, software, licensing or ongoing services. If those systems also used #JasmyChain, network activity would increase exponentially. Final thoughts: Why this patent deserves attention Jasmy's energy patent is interesting because it points towards another possible application for the company's technology. It describes a physical electricity-control invention and a potential blockchain-supported system for recording and coordinating electricity transactions. The involvement of Kazumasa Sato and his co-inventors is also noteworthy because it demonstrates identifiable technical contributions associated with Jasmy. For now, this patent is a potentially important piece of Jasmy's longer-term technology story rather than proof of an immediate price catalyst. If Jasmy eventually announces an operational energy marketplace built on JasmyChain, with JASMY playing a defined economic role, that would be a much more significant development for token holders. Until then, the patent is worth watching, but its commercial and cryptocurrency implications remain possibilities rather than established outcomes. Source: International patent publication WO2026028636A1, AC-DC Power Conversion Device and Power System, published 5 February 2026. https://patents.google.com/patent/WO2026028636A1/en Disclaimer: Jasmy Australia is an independent information platform and is not affiliated with Jasmy Corporation in Japan. This article is provided for educational and informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Patent publication does not establish commercial adoption, profitability or future cryptocurrency performance.

Introduction This analysis is not intended to predict undisclosed #Jasmy partnerships, imply that negotiations are taking place, or present speculation as fact. It is a hypothesis. Its purpose is to examine #Jasmy’s existing corporate relationships, historical projects, technology partners and ecosystem connections and ask a more useful strategic question: If Jasmy successfully commercialises the technology it has already developed, which existing relationships could realistically evolve into larger deployments? That is the basis of this paper's featured table, demonstrating Jasmy's corporate connections. Jasmy has accumulated relationships across mobility, consumer electronics, enterprise IT, travel, sport, IoT, artificial intelligence, digital identity, distributed computing and environmental markets. However, simply assembling a list of well-known corporate names has limited analytical value. Why this exercise is increasingly relevant Several of #Jasmy’s earlier ideas may be more commercially relevant now than when they were originally introduced. The clearest example is the Personal Data Locker, or PDL. A few years ago, the concept of individuals retaining greater control over their personal data could appear abstract. The rapid growth of generative AI has changed that calculation. AI becomes more useful when it can understand a person’s financial history, purchasing behaviour, identity information, travel preferences, workplace activity, device data, subscriptions, mobility patterns and other personal information. That creates an increasingly important commercial question: How can an AI use highly personal information without requiring the user to permanently surrender control of that information to every platform providing an AI service? That problem is closely aligned with Jasmy’s PDL proposition. Jasmy’s current technology stack is also broader than the original IoT-focused proposition. For example: #JPKI-linked verification and identity services can potentially establish who the user is. #PDL Personal Data Locker can govern which information that person chooses to share and under what conditions. Personal AI, enterprise applications, mobility services, travel applications, sport and IoT systems can make use of authorised data. #JANCTION and distributed GPU infrastructure can provide computing resources for AI, rendering and other GPU-intensive applications. #JasmyChain can provide blockchain infrastructure for transactions, permissions, provenance or other Web3 functions. #JASMY could provide an economic layer where applications require gas, settlement, payments, staking, access fees or other recurring token-dependent activity. The strategic opportunity lies in connecting these components rather than treating each as an isolated product. That is also why Jasmy’s existing corporate relationships warrant closer examination. A company that originally collaborated with Jasmy around Secure PC, IoT or mobility may now have access to a broader technology stack involving AI, identity, blockchain and distributed computing. Existing relationships and plausible future outcomes Important: The outcomes below are analytical hypotheses only. They are not announced projects, rumours or claims that discussions are taking place. The plausibility assessment reflects technological fit, existing relationship strength and commercial logic, not the probability of an announcement. How to read the plausibility ratings Rating Meaning Very high Strong existing relationship or active technology pathway, clear commercial problem and a natural extension of Jasmy technology. High Strong technological and commercial logic, but the next step would require additional development, commercial agreement or integration. Medium-high Credible scenario with a logical strategic fit, although there is less current evidence of active expansion. Medium Technically realistic, but dependent on several assumptions or an older/weaker relationship. Medium-low Interesting technological overlap, but insufficient evidence to infer a meaningful current corporate pathway. The analytical distinction that matters The more important issue is whether there is a credible pathway from the relationship that already exists to a commercially meaningful future application. Each hypothesis in this analysis therefore considers five factors. Relationship strength considers whether there is a documented partnership, project, implementation, MOU, endorsement or historical technical collaboration. Technology fit considers whether Jasmy currently possesses technology that addresses a genuine problem within the partner’s business. Commercial logic considers whether the proposed outcome could generate measurable value for the participating companies or their customers. Strategic continuity considers whether the hypothetical development would be a logical extension of work that has already taken place rather than an unrelated leap. Scalability considers whether the use case could move beyond a demonstration or pilot into broader enterprise or consumer deployment. The plausibility rating should therefore not be interpreted as a forecast probability. A “very high” rating means the proposed outcome has a strong technological and strategic rationale based on what is already known. It does not mean that such an announcement is expected. That distinction is important when analysing Jasmy. Technology companies routinely conduct pilots, proof-of-concept projects and strategic collaborations that never develop into commercial-scale deployments. Relationships can become inactive. Corporate priorities can change. Internal procurement requirements can delay projects. Competing technology can emerge. A technically attractive product can still fail to satisfy commercial return-on-investment requirements. The table should therefore be read as a structured hypothesis map, not as a list of expected announcements. It deliberately separates existing evidence from future hypothesis. A company appearing in Jasmy's history does not mean that company is currently preparing another Jasmy deployment. Similarly, a strong technological fit does not establish that discussions are occurring. The more useful purpose of the table is to identify where three conditions overlap: an existing relationship or credible ecosystem connection, a business problem that Jasmy technology could address, and a commercially logical path from the current relationship to a larger application. That makes the table a strategic opportunity map, rather than a partnership prediction list. What the table reveals The strongest conclusion is that Jasmy may not need an entirely new collection of high-profile partners to create meaningful commercial growth. A more credible route may be to deepen relationships that already exist by introducing technologies that were either immature or unavailable when those relationships began. Some of Jasmy’s earlier collaborations focused on relatively narrow applications such as Secure PC, workplace monitoring, IoT or mobility. The technology stack is now considerably broader. PDL can potentially control personal information. JPKI-linked services can support verified identity. Personal AI can create a consumer-facing application for that information. JANCTION can provide distributed computing resources. Smart Render can provide a demonstrable GPU workload. JasmyChain can support blockchain functions. JASMY could potentially provide an economic mechanism where token-based activity is genuinely required. That changes the potential value of earlier relationships: An IoT relationship can potentially evolve into an IoT, PDL and AI proposition. A mobility relationship can potentially expand into vehicle identity, telematics, charging, insurance and user-controlled data. A contact-centre project can potentially become a privacy-controlled AI customer-service platform. A PC manufacturer could potentially produce a secure Personal AI device. A GPU demonstration could become a commercial distributed-compute network. The critical issue is whether Jasmy can turn these possibilities into integrated commercial products. The strongest strategic clusters Several relationship clusters appear particularly significant. Panasonic Advanced Technology, Smart Render and JANCTION This is arguably one of the clearest paths from technology development to commercial usage. Smart Render already demonstrates a practical reason to use distributed GPUs. Animation, VFX, architectural rendering, game development and other visual industries require substantial computing resources. If commercial customers begin paying to use this infrastructure, Jasmy would gain something more valuable than another partnership announcement: measurable network utilisation.. The larger opportunity would emerge if the same distributed-compute infrastructure expands beyond rendering into AI inference or other enterprise GPU workloads. AppBank and Personal AI AppBank could become strategically important because Personal AI provides a consumer application capable of making PDL meaningful. Personal data control has limited value if there is no useful application consuming the data. Money Twin provides a potential use case in which people may actually want to give an AI controlled access to financial and lifestyle information because they receive useful analysis in return. The missing component is high-quality authenticated data. A bank, card company, brokerage or insurer would therefore represent a logical next participant. This is one of the strongest hypothetical expansion paths because it creates a clear commercial relationship between identity, personal data and AI. transcosmos and enterprise AI The transcosmos relationship is potentially favourable. Generative AI is rapidly moving into customer service, but customer-service systems require access to some of the most sensitive information companies hold. A customer may need an AI agent to understand their identity, account history, transactions, previous complaints, purchases and preferences. The commercial problem is therefore not simply building an AI chatbot. The harder problem is deciding which information the AI is permitted to access and under what conditions. That creates a credible role for Jasmy’s PDL and Secure PC technologies. Mobility: Witz and Toyota-related history The original mobility work involving Witz and Toyota becomes more strategically interesting as vehicles become increasingly software-driven. Connected vehicles can generate location history, driving style, charging information, maintenance data, entertainment preferences and insurance-relevant information. The economic value of that data is considerable. The privacy issues are equally substantial. A system allowing drivers to selectively share different categories of data with manufacturers, insurers, charging networks or service centres would closely resemble Jasmy’s original data-sovereignty proposition. The important caveat is that the historical Toyota connection should not be presented as evidence of a current Toyota corporate partnership. Critical risks The table identifies plausible opportunities, but there are several reasons to remain cautious. Relationship inflation Crypto markets often overinterpret corporate associations. A pilot, MOU, conference demonstration, technology endorsement or historical collaboration should not automatically be treated as evidence of a current large-scale partnership. There is a major difference between a company that has previously worked with Jasmy and a company that currently deploys Jasmy technology commercially across a meaningful number of users or devices. That distinction should remain central to any serious analysis. Commercialisation risk Jasmy has developed a wide technology portfolio. That breadth creates opportunity, but it also creates execution risk. Secure PC, PDL, Smart Render, JANCTION, JasmyChain, carbon markets, Personal AI and digital identity all have different customers, competitors, sales cycles and regulatory environments. The company needs to demonstrate that these technologies can become repeatable commercial products rather than remaining a collection of individual projects. Integration risk The strongest version of the Jasmy thesis depends on integration. PDL becomes more valuable if Personal AI uses it. Personal AI becomes more valuable if verified financial, travel, mobility or consumer information can be accessed through it. Distributed computing becomes more strategically important if it processes these applications. JasmyChain becomes more valuable if those applications generate recurring blockchain activity. JASMY becomes more economically significant if this activity creates persistent token demand. If those components remain largely separate, the potential network effect is substantially weaker. Scale risk Pilot activity is not enough. Future evidence should increasingly focus on measurable indicators such as active users, enterprise customers, PDL accounts, GPU utilisation, paid workloads, revenue, JasmyChain transactions and the quantity of JASMY required by real applications. Without scale metrics, even high-quality partnerships remain difficult to value. Token-value capture risk This is arguably the most important issue for JASMY holders. Jasmy Corporation can succeed commercially without necessarily creating equivalent value for the JASMY token. A Secure PC licence can generate corporate revenue without requiring JASMY. A PDL application can potentially create commercial value without significant token consumption. A Personal AI service can attract users without necessarily producing meaningful blockchain activity. Investors therefore need to distinguish between: Jasmy Corporation business growth, Jasmy ecosystem usage, and JASMY token demand. They are related concepts, but they are not interchangeable. The strongest future developments would clearly establish why users or businesses need JASMY, how frequently they require it, how much is consumed or locked, and whether demand increases as network activity grows. I will watch this area closely and keep you updated. What would constitute a genuinely significant announcement? The market naturally responds to major corporate names. However, a prestigious new partner is not necessarily the most important development. An announcement saying that Jasmy has entered another strategic collaboration with a large company would be interesting, but it could still represent only an early-stage pilot. A substantially more important announcement would state that an existing enterprise partner has moved from pilot activity into commercial deployment at scale, with disclosed numbers of users, devices, transactions or workloads. It would become even more significant if that deployment explicitly required JasmyChain activity or recurring JASMY usage. That would connect corporate adoption, technology utilisation and token economics. Those are the three factors that ultimately matter most. Conclusion The central hypothesis emerging from this analysis is not that every company historically connected with Jasmy will ultimately adopt the full Jasmy ecosystem. That would be unrealistic. The stronger hypothesis is that Jasmy may already possess a sufficiently diverse network of relationships to provide multiple credible routes to commercialisation. For example; Panasonic Advanced Technology offers a pathway into distributed computing and industrial technology. AppBank offers a pathway into Personal AI. transcosmos offers a pathway into enterprise AI and customer-data governance. Witz and earlier Toyota-linked mobility work offer a pathway into connected vehicles and smart mobility. Aplix provides an IoT and embedded-device pathway. Nippon Travel Agency provides a potential travel and identity pathway. AVITA and NEXSTGO provide hardware distribution possibilities. Sagan Tosu provides a consumer-facing environment in which data, identity and token utility can potentially be tested together. Green Carbon and NCCX provide a pathway into blockchain-based environmental markets. The strategic opportunity lies in whether Jasmy can connect these relationships through a common architecture, rather than managing each as an isolated project. The strongest version of that architecture would use verified identity to establish who the user is, PDL to govern what information the user permits others to access, Personal AI or enterprise applications to create practical value from that information, distributed computing infrastructure to provide processing capacity, JasmyChain to support blockchain functions, and JASMY to provide an economic mechanism where recurring token usage is required. That remains a hypothesis. What would convert it into evidence is commercial execution. The most important signals to monitor are therefore not simply new corporate names. They are commercial deployments, repeat customers, expanding user numbers, measurable GPU utilisation, sustained JasmyChain activity, disclosed revenue and clearly defined JASMY utility. The most credible long-term investment thesis is therefore not that one transformational partnership will suddenly validate Jasmy. It is that Jasmy may be building a data-sovereignty infrastructure layer for AI, IoT and digital services, and that companies already within its orbit could provide the first real distribution channels for that infrastructure. The quality of that thesis will ultimately be determined by whether Jasmy can convert corporate relationships into commercial usage, commercial usage into network activity, and network activity into recurring economic demand for JASMY. Until that progression becomes measurable, the scenarios in this report should remain exactly what they are intended to be: informed hypotheses grounded in existing relationships and technological fit, rather than predictions of future announcements.

JasmyChain has made an important infrastructure update to its live mainnet, moving users and developers to a new official RPC endpoint under the JasmyScan domain. The new mainnet details are: RPC: rpc.jasmyscan.net Explorer: explorer.jasmyscan.net Chain ID: 680 The previous RPC endpoint using alt.technology may eventually become unavailable. At first glance, an RPC change can sound like a minor technical adjustment. But it matters because an RPC is one of the key gateways through which wallets, applications and developers interact with a blockchain. More importantly, this update appears to be another step in consolidating JasmyChain infrastructure under a recognisable Jasmy-branded ecosystem. It does not mean JasmyChain has only just launched. The mainnet was already operational. What it does show is continued development of the infrastructure surrounding the network. Why does an RPC matter? RPC stands for Remote Procedure Call. In simple terms, an RPC acts as a communication bridge between an application and a blockchain. When a wallet or decentralised application wants to ask JasmyChain something, such as: What is this wallet balance? Has this transaction been confirmed? What is the current block number? Send this transaction to the network. What tokens does this wallet hold? …it generally needs an RPC endpoint through which to communicate with the blockchain. This makes RPC infrastructure fundamental to the everyday operation of a blockchain ecosystem. 10 FAQs about the JasmyChain mainnet update 1. Has JasmyChain just launched its mainnet? No. JasmyChain was already live. This is an infrastructure update to the existing mainnet, rather than the launch of a new blockchain. 2. What exactly has changed? The official RPC endpoint has moved to: rpc.jasmyscan.net The official block explorer is: explorer.jasmyscan.net The network continues to use: Chain ID 680 The previous alt.technology RPC may eventually stop operating, so developers and users are being directed toward the new endpoint. 3. Why is this technically important? Applications, wallets and developers need reliable infrastructure to communicate with a blockchain. Moving to a new official RPC provides a clearer and more unified entry point into JasmyChain. It also places the RPC and explorer within the same JasmyScan-branded infrastructure environment. 4. Does this mean Jasmy now controls more of its own infrastructure? It indicates greater ecosystem consolidation, but it would be premature to conclude from a domain change alone that Jasmy has achieved complete infrastructure independence. What we can say is that users and developers are now being directed toward Jasmy-branded JasmyChain infrastructure rather than the previous third-party-branded endpoint. That is a meaningful distinction. 5. What is JasmyScan? JasmyScan is the blockchain explorer environment for JasmyChain. A blockchain explorer allows anyone to inspect what is happening on the network. Users can examine information including: transactions wallet addresses smart contracts token transfers blocks gas usage network activity This is particularly useful because it allows community members to verify activity directly rather than relying only on announcements or social-media claims. 6. Is JASMY actually used on JasmyChain? Yes. JASMY is the native gas token of JasmyChain. Gas is the fee paid to execute transactions and interact with smart contracts on the network. This gives JASMY a direct technical function within JasmyChain. That distinction matters. Many crypto projects announce partnerships or products without creating any direct requirement for their token. JasmyChain provides JASMY with an identifiable blockchain utility: network gas. 7. Does this automatically create substantial demand for JASMY? No. This is an important distinction. Having token utility does not automatically mean that utility is economically significant. The real question is: How much will JasmyChain actually be used? If transaction volume remains low, gas demand will also remain low. If JasmyChain eventually supports large numbers of applications, users and transactions, the role of JASMY as gas becomes considerably more significant. Therefore, infrastructure is only the foundation. Adoption is what gives the infrastructure economic meaning. 8. What is already developing around JasmyChain? JasmyChain is increasingly beginning to look like a broader blockchain ecosystem rather than simply a standalone network. Visible infrastructure and applications include: JasmyChain JasmyScan smart-contract infrastructure token transfers JASMY/WJASMY functionality swap infrastructure liquidity functionality MemePad and ecosystem applications Each component creates another potential reason for users or developers to interact with JasmyChain. The next question is whether those applications attract meaningful usage. 9. Is this bullish for JASMY? Yes, fFrom a fundamental infrastructure perspective, continued development is highly constructive. However, an RPC change by itself should not be confused with a major commercial adoption event. It does not automatically mean: millions of new users significant new revenue large transaction volumes substantial new JASMY demand an immediate price increase Those outcomes would require evidence. The significance of this update is therefore better understood as another piece of the infrastructure required before larger-scale adoption can occur. 10. What should JASMY holders watch next? This is arguably the most important question. The next stage should be assessed using measurable data rather than announcements alone. Key metrics include: daily transactions active wallet addresses new addresses smart-contract deployments verified contracts JASMY bridged onto JasmyChain swap volume liquidity gas consumption application launches active users developer activity commercial integrations If these metrics begin growing consistently, we would have stronger evidence that JasmyChain is moving from infrastructure development into meaningful adoption. Development Potential benefit Jasmy-branded RPC Creates a clearer and more unified JasmyChain infrastructure identity JasmyScan explorer Improves visibility and transparency of blockchain activity JASMY used as gas Gives JASMY a direct technical function within the network EVM compatibility Makes it easier for Ethereum-compatible developers and applications to interact with JasmyChain Swap infrastructure Enables on-chain token exchange and liquidity activity Smart-contract support Allows applications and decentralised services to operate directly on JasmyChain MemePad and ecosystem applications Creates additional reasons for users to interact with the network Chain ID 680 Provides JasmyChain with a distinct network identity Public blockchain data Allows users to independently verify transactions and activity Expanding infrastructure Provides the technical foundation required for future ecosystem growth Why the JASMY gas mechanism is especially important One of the most significant aspects of JasmyChain is the relationship between the blockchain and the JASMY token itself. JASMY is not merely displayed alongside the network. It performs a network function. When transactions occur on JasmyChain, JASMY is required for gas. Conceptually, the relationship looks like this: More applications → more users → more transactions → more gas usage → greater functional use of JASMY That does not mean every increase in transactions will materially affect market price. Gas fees can be extremely small, and the economic impact depends on the scale of network activity. Nevertheless, it creates an important mechanism connecting ecosystem adoption with token utility. From blockchain launch to ecosystem development The larger story may therefore not be the RPC update itself. It is the direction in which the pieces appear to be moving. Jasmy now has an increasingly visible collection of connected infrastructure: JasmyChain → JasmyScan → JASMY gas → smart contracts → swap → liquidity → ecosystem applications The transition worth watching is whether JasmyChain progresses from being technically operational to being actively used. That is a much higher bar. A functioning blockchain proves that the infrastructure exists. An active blockchain proves that people have reasons to use it. The next phase: watch the numbers The most useful way to evaluate JasmyChain from here is not simply to count announcements. It is to monitor measurable network activity. That means watching: Users. Transactions. Contracts. Volume. Liquidity. Gas consumption. Applications. If those indicators begin rising materially and consistently, the discussion around JasmyChain changes. It would no longer simply be: “Jasmy has built a blockchain.” It would increasingly become: “People are actually using it.” That is the distinction that matters. Summary The new JasmyChain RPC does not represent a new mainnet launch. Instead, it represents another stage in the development and consolidation of the existing JasmyChain infrastructure. The move toward JasmyScan-branded RPC and explorer infrastructure provides a clearer network environment for wallets, developers and users. The more consequential feature remains the use of JASMY as the native gas token. However, infrastructure alone does not establish adoption. The strongest evidence from here will come from measurable growth across transactions, users, smart contracts, liquidity, applications and gas consumption. For JasmyChain, the technology is increasingly visible. Now the key question is whether usage follows. This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice.

A new BlackRock Digital Assets Research paper, The Machine-Native Economy, was released 21 hours ago, 23 September 2026. Whilst it does not mention #Jasmy, #JANCTION or #JasmyChain, its core thesis is strikingly relevant to the direction the Jasmy ecosystem appears to be pursuing through distributed GPU compute, Smart Render, data infrastructure and blockchain-based settlement. The paper argues that artificial intelligence is moving beyond simply generating text and images. Increasingly, AI systems may be able to find services, make decisions within their permissions, purchase data or computing capacity, and pay for those services automatically. This is the beginning of what BlackRock calls a “machine-native economy”. For #Jasmy holders, the useful question is not whether the paper is secretly about JASMY. It is not. The question is whether it describes the broader market in which JANCTION and Smart Render could eventually operate. And, it does. BlackRock’s paper says the next stage of AI may involve software that can do things for us, not just answer questions. For example, an AI assistant may eventually: find the cheapest GPU power to render a video rent that computing power automatically pay for it instantly receive the completed work without a person having to manage every step This creates a potential new economy where AI, payments and computer processing work together. That is relevant to Jasmy because #JANCTION and #SmartRender are aiming at a similar area. Smart Render is designed to use powerful GPUs (including connected idle GPUs) to do heavy video and image-rendering work outside a creator’s own computer. In simple terms: instead of your laptop struggling for hours to render a video, the job could be sent to a network of powerful computers and completed much faster. Where JASMY could fit is through JasmyChain. If applications such as Smart Render use JasmyChain and people need JASMY to pay network fees, then more genuine use of those applications could mean more ongoing use of JASMY. AI needs a way to pay BlackRock starts with a simple but powerful idea: “AI represents machine-native intelligence, while digital assets represent machine-native money.” (p. 2) In other words, AI can make decisions and perform tasks, while blockchain-based assets can move value according to programmable rules. Put those together and an AI agent could potentially request a service, pay for it and confirm delivery without the slow manual processes of traditional payment systems. The paper says that, as AI becomes more capable, it will need infrastructure designed for continuous, small-scale transactions: “Agentic commerce requires machine-native payment rails.” (p. 2) This matters because a future AI system may not make one large monthly payment. It may make thousands of tiny payments for data, API calls, model usage, storage or GPU compute. BlackRock describes blockchains as particularly suited to: “High-frequency, sub-cent, machine-to-machine (M2M) transactions.” (p. 5) That is a meaningful conceptual fit with JasmyChain’s role as an L2 where JASMY is used as custom gas. If real applications make frequent on-chain transactions, the chain needs a mechanism to pay for them. The important part, however, is the word real. A gas token only gains durable utility if people and applications actually use the network. The clearest link: distributed GPU compute The strongest connection is #BlackRock’s focus on compute as an emerging digital-asset market. “Compute is emerging as a new and potentially large market for digital assets.” (p. 2) This is very close to the opportunity behind #JANCTION and Smart Render. Smart Render has been described as a distributed rendering application that uses company-owned GPUs alongside connected idle GPUs, with work allocated across the network. Its immediate use case is rendering video and high-precision Blender files, so creators can offload demanding processing from their own computers. BlackRock’s broader argument is that computing power is becoming an economic resource in its own right: “Compute is becoming a distinct, large, and increasingly investable economic resource.” (p. 7) The paper is not describing one specific project or saying that distributed GPU networks will automatically succeed. It is saying that, as AI demand grows, the market will need better ways to price, allocate, finance and pay for computing capacity. That is the big-picture opportunity for JANCTION: not merely “crypto plus AI”, but a useful marketplace where people or software can access compute when they need it. What a functioning network could look like BlackRock envisages agents that can examine available compute capacity and choose the best option for a particular task: “Agents could query real-time marketplace APIs to compare available capacity by price, performance, latency, location, and hardware specialization.” (p. 9) Imagine a creator needing to render a complex animation, or an AI tool requiring short-term GPU power. Instead of manually researching cloud providers, the software could compare available capacity across a network and select a suitable provider. The paper then describes the desired outcome: “This framework could enable elastic, just-in-time access to compute with limited human intervention.” (p. 9) That is precisely why #SmartRender’s operational testing is more important than vague AI marketing. If it can demonstrate that work is actually distributed, completed reliably, stored safely and paid for economically, it begins to prove a practical use case. The company’s claimed 94% reduction in rendering time during internal verification is promising, but it remains an internal result until independent or user-level evidence shows how the service performs at scale. Where JASMY could fit, and what must still be proven BlackRock notes that programmable payment tools could support settlement: “On-demand settlement on a per-use, per-model-token, or per-job basis.” (p. 9) For Jasmy, this is the key economic question: could JASMY become necessary within an active ecosystem of compute jobs, storage, data services or other applications? If #JANCTION applications use #JasmyChain and transactions require #JASMY for gas, then increased application activity should generate increased token usage at the network level. But that alone does not tell us how much value will accrue to JASMY holders. The outcome depends on the fee model, gas pricing, token circulation, any subsidies, the number of users and whether activity is genuine rather than test or promotional traffic. BlackRock itself gives the right caution: “The ecosystem remains nascent, with agentic payment activity and compute-market liquidity still limited.” (p. 10) This means the whole area is still very early and not yet widely used. “Ecosystem remains nascent”: the technology, businesses and users are still developing. “Agentic payment activity”: AI agents are not yet routinely making lots of real automated payments for services, data or compute. “Compute-market liquidity still limited”: there are not yet large, easy-to-use markets where people can reliably buy, sell or trade spare GPU/computing power at transparent prices. For JANCTION/Smart Render: the idea is promising, but the market is not mature yet. The proof will be real customers submitting real rendering jobs and providers reliably supplying GPU capacity. That applies squarely here. The opportunity is real, but early. Smart Render is an operational product in testing, not yet evidence of a large and liquid compute marketplace. Why this is still worth watching The paper’s conclusion captures the larger theme: “AI and blockchain-based digital assets are increasingly converging as machines take a greater role in economic activity.” (p. 10) Jasmy’s relevance lies in whether it can turn that convergence into practical services: secure data handling, identity, distributed compute, creator tools and an accessible payment layer. The most constructive way to view #JANCTION and #SmartRender is not as a guaranteed price catalyst, but as a potential pathway to measurable utility. The milestones worth watching are clear: public access to Smart Render and other JANCTION applications real customer or creator usage transparent job, user and revenue metrics evidence that the #GPU network is reliable and economically competitive clarity on when and how #JASMY is used in the application flow sustained JasmyChain activity beyond testing BlackRock’s paper does not validate JASMY as an investment. What it does validate is the relevance of the problem space: AI needs compute, compute needs efficient allocation, and automated systems may increasingly need programmable settlement. If #JANCTION can execute on that vision, it would be operating in exactly the kind of machine-native economy BlackRock believes is beginning to form.

For years, Jasmy’s Personal Data Locker (PDL) has been relatively easy to understand: give individuals a secure environment in which they can control their personal data rather than allowing that data to remain exclusively under the control of large platforms. But a post by Jasmy CFO Hara on 7 July 2026 raises a potentially much bigger idea. Discussing the secure storage of point-cloud data, Hara acknowledged that #Jasmy may have focused too heavily on aggregating data into the PDL. He then suggested another approach: data could remain external but be accessible when required, with Jasmy positioned as a “platform for connecting to external data.” This may sound like a technical refinement. But, it represents a significant evolution in Jasmy’s data architecture. Instead of bringing all the data to Jasmy, Jasmy could potentially become the secure connection between the user, their data and the applications that need it. The evolution in one view The importance of this progression becomes clearer when we return to some of #Jasmy’s earlier work with artificial intelligence and personal data. 2021: Jasmy and Koozyt were already thinking about AI differently In March 2021, Jasmy and Koozyt announced joint work on an application framework provisionally called the KJ Engine. The underlying idea was remarkably relevant to today's AI environment. Internet searches, social media, games, devices and other digital services continuously generate information about people's interests and behaviour. AI can analyse these interactions and discover characteristics about an individual that the person may not even consciously recognise. Normally, those insights are extremely valuable to the company collecting the data. They can be used for advertising, personalisation, product development and other commercial purposes. Jasmy and Koozyt approached the problem differently. They asked whether those AI-derived characteristics could instead be made visible to the individual, helping that person understand their own behaviour and potentially use those insights for decision-making and wellbeing. The objective was not simply to prevent information from being analysed. It was to explore whether the individual could become the beneficiary of the intelligence derived from their own data. But that immediately creates another problem. Personal data does not live in one place Think about how fragmented a person's digital life is. Shopping information may reside with Amazon or Rakuten. Exercise information may reside with a wearable provider. Vehicle information may sit with a manufacturer. Smartphone information exists across multiple applications. Other data can reside in government, enterprise, IoT, financial, entertainment or creator platforms. So one person may generate valuable information across dozens—or eventually hundreds—of independent systems. That creates a fundamental architectural question: How does Jasmy use distributed personal data without simply creating another giant centralised database? Jasmy’s 2022 experiments help illustrate the difficulty. 2022: #Amazon and #Rakuten demonstrated both the opportunity and the limitation Jasmy’s Interest AI experiment used participants’ Amazon and Rakuten purchase histories to analyse their interests. The important detail is how Jasmy obtained the information. Jasmy did not simply connect directly to Amazon or Rakuten and retrieve purchase histories. Participants obtained their own purchase-history information. Jasmy provided a processing method to prepare the information, after which the data could be supplied to the Jasmy environment for analysis. This demonstrated something important. External personal data could be combined with AI to produce something useful for the individual. But it also exposed a practical limitation. If every new data source requires information to be downloaded, processed, copied and transferred into another environment, scaling the model becomes considerably more difficult. Imagine repeating this not just with Amazon and Rakuten, but with shopping, vehicles, health devices, IoT systems, creator platforms, business systems and enormous machine-generated datasets. That brings us to Hara’s July 2026 post. 2026: Hara questions the original assumption On 7 July 2026, Hara discussed a conversation about how companies and individuals could securely store point-cloud data. The key section translates approximately as: “Jasmy may have been focusing a little too heavily on the concept of aggregating data into the PDL.” He then raised another possibility: “External data that can be accessed at any time.” And, importantly: “A platform for connecting to external data.” That changes the question. Instead of asking: How do we move external data into the PDL? Jasmy can potentially ask: How does the PDL securely connect to data wherever it already resides? That is potentially much more scalable. From Personal Data Locker to Personal Data Hub The change sounds small, but it is strategically important. Old emphasis: Keep my data here. Emerging emphasis: Control my data from here. The PDL therefore potentially becomes less about being the destination for every piece of information and more about being the control point through which distributed information can be accessed. Why point-cloud data is an important clue The context of Hara’s post matters. He was discussing point-cloud data. Point clouds are large three-dimensional datasets that can digitally represent objects, buildings, cities and physical environments. They can be generated by LiDAR, cameras and other sensing technologies and are relevant to fields including digital twins, robotics, autonomous systems, construction, mapping and spatial computing. These datasets can become enormous. Moving and duplicating an entire dataset simply because another application needs to perform a task with it can be inefficient. And that principle is not restricted to point clouds. The same architecture could potentially apply to IoT sensors, vehicles, personal devices, enterprise systems, creator platforms and many other sources. Why AI makes this much more important AI changes the significance of this architecture. Modern AI systems need data, but they do not necessarily need to own or permanently store every underlying dataset. They need the right information, with the appropriate permission, at the appropriate time. Imagine an AI application attempting to provide a personalised service. Relevant information might sit across shopping platforms, devices, IoT systems, location services, enterprise systems, creator platforms and personal preference data. Instead of moving all of that information into one central repository, a different architecture becomes possible. This changes how we might think about the value of a PDL. The important question may no longer be: How much data does the PDL store? A more important question could become: How much useful data can the PDL securely connect, permission and make available to authorised applications? That is a substantially broader proposition. This takes us back to KJ Engine This is why the original Koozyt collaboration deserves another look. Koozyt and Jasmy’s 2021 proposal involved analysing interactions between people and multiple external “social devices.” The objective was to use AI to discover behavioural characteristics and return useful insights to the individual. But accomplishing that at scale inherently requires access to distributed information. Five years later, Hara is explicitly discussing a PDL architecture that could connect to externally held data rather than requiring everything to be accumulated internally. That does not prove that Hara’s 2026 proposal is a direct continuation of KJ Engine. But the technological progression is coherent. Seen this way, Hara’s comments do not necessarily represent a retreat from the original PDL idea. They may represent an attempt to remove one of its architectural limitations. From data ownership to data orchestration Jasmy’s original philosophy can broadly be summarised as: Your data should belong to you. But ownership alone does not make data useful. The emerging model potentially extends the philosophy. This begins to look less like simple data storage and more like data orchestration. And that distinction could become increasingly important as AI agents and applications require access to information spread across many different systems. Where could JasmyChain fit? There is an obvious question for anyone following Jasmy today: Where does JasmyChain fit into this architecture? Conceptually, blockchain infrastructure could potentially provide functions such as verification, transactions, permissions, auditability or economic settlement. Eventually one could imagine: External Data → PDL → AI / Applications → JasmyChain → JASMY But this is where evidence becomes essential. Hara’s July post does not establish that JasmyChain currently implements this entire architecture. Nor does the historical KJ Engine work prove that Smart Render or today’s creator initiatives are direct descendants of that project. Those connections still need to be demonstrated technically. And that may now be one of the most important areas for the Jasmy community to investigate. Why Hara’s post matters Hara did not announce a new blockchain. He did not announce a huge commercial partnership. He did not announce new JASMY token utility. Instead, he questioned something more fundamental: Why must the data come to Jasmy at all? That single question potentially changes the architecture from simple data storage into a broader system of ownership, control, connection, authorised AI use and potential value creation. In an AI economy, that could become considerably more important than simply building another repository for information. Jasmy began with the proposition: Your data should belong to you. KJ Engine explored whether AI could help individuals understand and benefit from that data. Interest AI demonstrated how external behavioural data could actually be analysed. And now Hara is questioning whether that external information even needs to be moved into the PDL in the first place. That gives us a remarkably clean progression: OWN IT → UNDERSTAND IT → CONTROL IT → CONNECT IT → CREATE VALUE FROM IT Perhaps that is the most important implication of Hara’s July 2026 post. The Personal Data Locker may ultimately become less about the locker, and much more about the key. Resources Date: 7 July 2026, 20:23 Japan time. Translation: We had a constructive discussion about how companies and individuals can securely store point-cloud data. Jasmy may have been focusing a little too heavily on the concept of aggregating data into the PDL. We are also considering positioning it as “external data that can be accessed at any time” and as a “platform for connecting to external data.” #JASMY #PDL #datahub The key phrase is the final one: “platform for connecting to external data.” That is the part that supports the idea of the PDL evolving from mainly a storage destination into more of a secure access and connection layer. 17 March 2021 — Jasmy × Koozyt announce joint development of the KJ Engine, combining blockchain and AI to return personalised behavioural insights to the individual. This image comes from the original Jasmy × Koozyt announcement dated 17 March 2021. It announced that the two companies had begun joint R&D and were considering proof-of-concept testing for what they called the “KJ Engine” (provisional name). English translation Koozyt × Jasmy Currently, in areas such as internet search, social media and social games, unconscious characteristic data relating to users’ interests and behaviour is continuously learned through advances in AI data-analysis technology as users interact with individual services and applications. This data is then used for a variety of purposes, including improving service quality and functionality and delivering targeted advertising. In order for the relationship between people and society not to become distorted, and for people to live happily and experience well-being, could these unconscious characteristics be visualised in a form that users can appropriately recognise, helping them notice those characteristics, bring them into conscious awareness and use them for metacognition? If we provisionally call devices placed within society that act as hubs for interaction between people and society “social devices,” then the unconscious characteristic data extracted from interaction data between people and those social devices is extremely important personal data. We believe that this data should securely belong to the individual, while services and applications should be able to use it appropriately, both consciously and unconsciously. Based on this awareness of the issue, Jasmy and Koozyt have decided to combine rapidly developing blockchain technology and AI data-science technology. Through mining interaction data between people and social devices, they aim to personalise data characteristics derived at an unconscious level, and then visualise those characteristics in a recognisable form so that people can use them for their own well-being and as support for decision-making. To achieve this, they began development of an application framework provisionally called “KJ Engine.” Why the date matters This is not a new 2026 Jasmy development. The concept dates back to 17 March 2021. But the direction has changed from 7 July 2026. It is significant historically because it shows that several themes #Jasmy is discussing today — personal ownership of data, AI analysis, blockchain, personalised data, conscious/unconscious behavioural signals and decision-support applications — were already part of its architecture more than five years ago. Jasmy later confirmed in February 2022 that KJ Engine had continued in development and was being taken toward practical use through its “Platinum Data Happiness Discovery Project,” involving the Personal Data Locker and rewards in JasmyCoin. In summary, on 7 July 2026, Hara is explicitly describing a #PDL architecture that could connect to externally held data, using #AI, rather than requiring everything to be accumulated internally. This article distinguishes documented Jasmy/Koozyt concepts and Hara’s July 2026 comments from potential future architecture. Connections to JasmyChain, Smart Render and JASMY utility should not be treated as confirmed until supported by technical or official evidence. This is not financial advice.

Something potentially very significant has appeared on Remixpoint's DEEPPOINT. But first, remember what Hiroshi Harada, Hara, has already told us. Hara on JASMY + JPYD In 2026, Hara made the relationship remarkably clear: “As a custom gas token, $JASMY will serve as the base currency for corporate token issuance and $JPYD (stablecoin).” He then described the bigger objective: “The two ecosystems will interact with each other, aiming to expand their influence.” And put Jasmy's technology at the centre: “Of course, the center of the #JASMY ecosystem is Jasmy #PDL.” That PDL, he said, was evolving into: “the #SuperWallet (tentative name), a versatile authentication tool.” Most bullishly: “Major development preparations are already complete.” Read those statements together. JASMY + JPYD + corporate tokens + PDL + SuperWallet + JasmyChain + JANCTION. This is an ecosystem. And Hara had been signalling JPYD for years Back in August 2024, Hara said: “We've also recently acquired the trademark for JPYD.” And then: “We hope to use this as a new common currency.” Jasmy's payment vision was also described around this period as: “a payment system for the wallet that combines a point system with a stablecoin.” So the stablecoin component isn't a new theory created by the community. They told us about it. Now look at DEEPPOINT Fast-forward to today. Remixpoint's DEEPPOINT is mapping Japan's emerging yen-stablecoin market. And sitting alongside the other Japanese stablecoin projects is: JPYD Network — Coming Soon That immediately caught my attention. Why? Because Hara is also a director of Remixpoint and heads its Digital Asset Management Division. So connect the dots: Hara / Jasmy - JASMY + JPYD + PDL + SuperWallet Hara / JANCTION - Interacting ecosystem + compute infrastructure Hara / Remixpoint - Director + Digital Asset Management Remixpoint / DEEPPOINT - Tracking Japan's emerging stablecoin infrastructure DEEPPOINT and JPYD — Coming Soon That's a pretty big link. Why could JPYD matter so much to JASMY? Because JASMY and JPYD don't need to compete. They could do different jobs. JASMY - Gas + ecosystem utility + corporate-token base currency JPYD - Stable yen-denominated payment and settlement PDL / SuperWallet - Identity + authentication + personal data JasmyChain - Blockchain infrastructure JANCTION - Compute + GPU + AI infrastructure Put it together: IDENTITY + DATA + COMPUTE + BLOCKCHAIN + TOKENISATION + PAYMENTS That is a very different proposition from simply asking: “When will JASMY pump?” The bigger question is whether we are watching the infrastructure for an actual digital economy being assembled piece by piece. The link I am watching None of this proves that Remixpoint will issue JPYD. It doesn't yet prove JPYD will launch on JasmyChain. But this part is factual: Hara has explicitly linked JASMY with JPYD. Hara has described JPYD as a stablecoin. Hara has said JASMY will serve as a base currency for JPYD. Hara is a director of Remixpoint. Remixpoint operates DEEPPOINT. DEEPPOINT now tracks JPYD as “Coming Soon”. For me, that's no longer a connection worth ignoring. $JASMY → JPYD → JASMYCHAIN → SUPERWALLET → JANCTION If those pieces ultimately connect in production, JASMY's role could be considerably bigger than the market currently appreciates. And Hara may have already told us exactly where this is heading. Disclaimer: JPYD's final technical architecture, issuer and blockchain deployment have not yet been confirmed. My article distinguishes confirmed public statements from possible future integration and is not financial advice. #Jasmy #JPYD #Jasmychain #Superwallet #Janction #Deeppoint

If you wanted to sell me on $JASMY and $JCT, don't start with the charts or the current valuations. And don't even remind me about Hara's 'deal' loss in January 2026. Sell me the people. This team is not going to fail. The writing is on the wall. This isn't a team assembled from anonymous crypto developers and influencers. Look at who is actually behind the ecosystem. Kunitake Ando — former President & COO of Sony Ando didn't simply work at Sony. He ran it. His career included President and COO of Sony Corporation, President and COO of Sony Engineering and Manufacturing of America, Chairman of Sony Financial Holdings and Chairman of Sony Life Insurance. #Jasmy says he also helped establish new Sony business models, including the launch of VAIO PCs and Sony's life-insurance business. That's serious corporate pedigree sitting at the top of Jasmy. Kazumasa Sato — President & COO of Jasmy Another former senior Sony executive. Sato previously led Sony Style Japan, held executive roles within Sony Marketing and headed Sony's Creative Center. His background is particularly relevant because Jasmy doesn't merely need clever technology. It needs someone who understands how technology becomes a product, how products are positioned and how they scale. Tadashi Morita — Jasmy's security chief This one deserves much more attention. Morita spent decades as a Sony engineer. He worked on FeliCa cards, mobile-wallet chips and NFC technology and helped drive NFC international standardisation. Jasmy says he filed approximately 100 patents during his Sony career and later became one of Sony's Chief Distinguished Engineers. Jasmy's own whitepaper identifies him as a former FeliCa project leader. Think about the relevance. Jasmy is attempting to build infrastructure around secure identity, devices and personal data, and one of the people responsible for its security architecture spent his career working on technologies at the heart of Japan's contactless digital infrastructure. Hiroshi “Hara” Harada — the bridge between Jasmy and JANCTION Hara brings something completely different. He's a Japanese CPA who spent years at KPMG AZSA working on listed-company audits and IPO support. Today he sits at an unusually important intersection: #Jasmy CFO. #JasmyLab representative director. #JANCTION CEO. And increasingly involved in digital-asset and deep-tech business development. He's therefore sitting where capital, corporate strategy, JASMY, JANCTION and emerging products meet. And Hara has publicly said he intends to bring the JASMY and JANCTION ecosystems closer together. That statement is one of the reasons I'm watching this relationship so closely. Kyohei Ito — the builder Then you get a very different generation. Ito became Vice President of Engineering at JasmyLab in 2026. His background includes Web3 engineering, blockchain architecture, developer ecosystems and product development. This matters because Jasmy's original leadership brought enormous corporate and engineering experience. What the ecosystem increasingly needs now is execution. GPU Pool. #SmartRender. #JasmyChain. #PDL. Data infrastructure. Actual products people can use. Ito represents that newer engineering layer tasked with turning the broader vision into functioning technology. And that's what makes the overall team interesting to me. You have: a former President of Sony providing strategic leadership former senior Sony executives with product and commercial experience a Sony engineer deeply involved in FeliCa/NFC and security technology a CPA and former KPMG auditor connecting finance, digital assets and corporate development a younger Web3 engineering team building the next generation of products JANCTION developing distributed GPU and AI infrastructure Jasmy developing identity, data ownership and enterprise infrastructure JasmyChain increasingly providing the blockchain layer connecting parts of it together None of that guarantees that $JASMY or $JCT succeeds. Great résumés don't automatically create token value. Revenue, adoption, users and genuine token demand still have to follow. But if you ask me what makes the Jasmy/JANCTION story difficult to dismiss, it's this: These aren't people learning how to build technology companies for the first time. Some of them helped build, commercialise and secure technologies used by millions of people long before crypto existed. Now they're attempting to do it again; this time across data, identity, blockchain, AI and distributed computing. That's the bet. Not just the tokens. The team behind them.

Japan is moving beyond simply supporting Web3. In May 2026, Japan’s Liberal Democratic Party released its “Next-Generation AI and On-Chain Finance Vision”, forming part of the broader Digital Nippon 2026 policy programme. The vision is for a financial system increasingly built around: AI agents trusted and verified data digital identity yen stablecoins tokenised bank deposits tokenised real-world assets smart contracts 24/7 financial markets near-instant or T+0 settlement. The ultimate concept is surprisingly straightforward: Trusted data → AI decision-making → smart contracts → digital money → on-chain settlement Stablecoins are a major part of the plan Japan is examining a future in which yen stablecoins could be used for everyday and business payments, while tokenised bank deposits could handle larger institutional transactions. The policy also discusses clarifying whether stablecoins could eventually be used for areas such as salaries, taxes and capital contributions. Bank-issued stablecoins are also under consideration. Importantly, this isn't only theoretical. Japan's Financial Services Agency has been supporting experiments involving major banks and securities companies exploring blockchain-based securities settlement. AI and finance come together The plan envisages AI agents eventually being capable of initiating transactions automatically. For example, AI could verify that goods have been delivered and contractual requirements satisfied. A smart contract could then automatically release payment using a yen stablecoin. Receivables generated through that transaction could themselves potentially be tokenised and financed. That creates an economy where identity, trusted data, AI, blockchain and money increasingly operate together. Where could Jasmy fit? This is where things become interesting, but we need to distinguish evidence from speculation. Jasmy already operates in an area Japan will need for this type of economy: trusted digital identity and personal data. Jasmy's Personal Data Locker (PDL) has been connected with Japan's JPKI public personal authentication infrastructure, using the electronic certificates contained in My Number Cards for identity verification. Conceptually, that creates a possible architecture: My Number/JPKI → verified identity → PDL/trusted data → AI → blockchain → programmable payment JasmyChain could potentially provide part of the blockchain infrastructure within such an environment. However, there is currently no evidence that the Japanese government has selected JasmyChain for its national on-chain finance infrastructure or that JASMY will be used as a settlement asset. That remains the critical missing connection. Why this matters Under former Prime Minister #Kishida, Japan promoted Data Free Flow with Trust (DFFT) — creating economic value from data while maintaining trust. Japan's newer policy direction goes considerably further. It increasingly combines: trusted data + verified identity + AI + blockchain + tokenised assets + programmable money #Jasmy already has demonstrable exposure to the identity and trusted-data side of that architecture. The major question now is whether JasmyChain and ultimately JASMY become connected to the financial and settlement side as well. I would characterise the evolution like this: #Kishida era Digital society → DFFT → trusted data → My Number/digital identity → Web3 development #Takaichi era Digital society → DFFT remains → My Number expands → private-sector digital identity expands → trusted/high-quality data becomes increasingly important for AI → AX/DX becomes a national growth strategy → Web3 environment continues → on-chain finance enters the policy discussion That is something worth watching very closely. In fact, after reading the actual 2026 document, I think the connection we've been following is materially stronger than simply “Japan is crypto-friendly.” Japan is trying to construct a trusted, identity-aware, AI-compatible, programmable financial/data economy. Jasmy already occupies one identifiable piece of that architecture. What we need to watch now is whether it gets pulled into the money and settlement layer. Key official links Next-Generation AI and On-Chain Finance Vision (English) https://storage2.jimin.jp/pdf/news/policy/213248_10.pdf Next-Generation AI and On-Chain Finance Vision (Japanese) https://www.jimin.jp/policy/policy-related/strategic-investment-growth/nextgen-ai-onchain-finance.html Digital Nippon 2026 https://www.jimin.jp/news/policy/213248.html Japan Digital Agency: JPKI for private-sector businesses https://www.digital.go.jp/policies/mynumber/private-business/jpki-introduction Japan Digital Agency; My Number private-sector initiatives https://www.digital.go.jp/policies/mynumber/private-business/info Japan Financial Services Agency https://www.fsa.go.jp/

Real patents. Real technology. A clearer picture. Last checked: 13 September 2026 #Jasmy #JasmyLab #Janction #Remixpoint #Deeppoint #Hara When we talk about technology companies, it is easy to focus on announcements, partnerships and future plans. Inspired by the lack of forthcoming information from the recent VO1D event, I've decided to dig deeper into the area of patents because they give us something different. They show technologies that a company or inventor has considered sufficiently important and potentially novel to seek legal protection. For the companies surrounding Jasmy, the patent trail is particularly interesting because it stretches across: personal-data protection blockchain cryptographic authentication biometrics identity verification near-field communication artificial intelligence and image processing battery storage electricity-market optimisation power conversion distributed computing In this article, I seek to distinguish granted patents, pending applications, international families, divisional filings, historical patents and related third-party patents rather than blending them together. This article looks at six areas: Jasmy JasmyLab JANCTION Remixpoint DEEPPOINT Other patents directly relevant to the people and technology behind these companies Importantly, a patent application is not the same thing as a granted patent. I have therefore labelled the status of each patent as clearly as possible. First: how to read the status GRANTED A patent office has examined the application and granted patent rights. PENDING The application has been filed but has not yet resulted in a granted patent. PCT / INTERNATIONAL APPLICATION A PCT application provides a route for seeking patent protection internationally. It does not mean that the inventor automatically owns a patent in every country. Separate national or regional patent rights generally have to be pursued. EXPIRED / HISTORICAL The patent existed but the particular right is no longer active. RELATED The patent is relevant because of an inventor, partner or underlying technology, but it is not owned by the company being discussed. That distinction is particularly important when discussing #Tadashi Morita's earlier #Sony inventions. 1. JASMY #Jasmy has the most directly relevant patent portfolio in this group. Its identifiable patent work covers personal data, blockchain, device authentication, biometric security, interactive identity verification and, most recently, electrical power systems. These should not be treated as one giant patent. They are separate inventions. JASMY PATENT 1 Personal information sharing with selective disclosure Patent: JP7313642B2 Title: Terminal Device, Information Processing System and Program Applicant / owner: Jasmy Incorporated Priority: 6 August 2020 Japan status: GRANTED Registration: 14 July 2023 View JP7313642B2 patent record What problem is it trying to solve? When somebody proves who they are to a company or service, they often provide far more personal information than the organisation actually needs. For example, proving that you meet an age requirement does not necessarily require handing over your complete identity record. Jasmy's invention creates a distinction between highly identifying personal information and information derived from it that has a lower level of identifiability. What does the patent actually do? The terminal stores highly identifying information. It can then associate that information with other personal information that reveals less about the individual. That lower-identifiability information can be supplied to another party. The patent also incorporates blockchain into the management and provision of this information. Example Think of your complete identity as being locked inside a secure box. Instead of giving a company the entire box, the system could provide only the particular fact that the company needs. The aim is essentially: prove what is necessary without unnecessarily revealing who you are. Why would Jasmy want this? This fits directly with Jasmy's long-standing concept of data sovereignty. Rather than organisations automatically accumulating complete profiles about people, the individual can potentially exercise much more control over which information is released. Potential applications include: personal Data Locker age or eligibility verification digital identity membership verification enterprise identity systems consent-based personal-data sharing Web3 identity International status This invention became the foundation of an international patent family. That means the same underlying invention has been pursued in several jurisdictions. JASMY PATENT 2 Encrypted sharing of more sensitive personal information Patent application: JP2023126889A Applicant: Jasmy IncorporatedJ apan status: PENDING Filed: 4 July 2023 Published: 12 September 2023 Priority: 6 August 2020 View JP2023126889A patent application What problem is this one trying to solve? Sometimes the receiving organisation really does need the more sensitive identifying information. That creates another problem: "How can highly identifying information be transmitted while ensuring that only the intended recipient can read it?" What does it do? This application develops the earlier personal-information concept further. Highly identifying information can be written using blockchain while remaining encrypted. The intended recipient possesses the cryptographic key required to decrypt it. Example Imagine putting confidential information into a locked digital envelope. The envelope can travel through a shared system, but only the intended recipient has the key. Anyone else seeing the envelope cannot simply read its contents. Why is it important? This moves the concept from merely reducing the amount of information disclosed to protecting sensitive information when it actually must be disclosed. That could be useful for: verified digital identity regulated services financial onboarding employment verification health or insurance environments government-linked identity services It should not, however, be interpreted as proof that any Japanese government system currently uses this patent. JASMY PATENT FAMILY WITH INTERNATIONAL STATUS The underlying personal-information invention was also filed internationally as: WO2022030570A1 International application: PCT/JP2021/029064Status: PCT publication View WO2022030570A1 international record The known family includes: Japan JP7313642B2 — GRANTED Japan patent Taiwan TWI880013B — GRANTED The Taiwanese patent was granted in April 2025. Taiwan patent TWI880013B United States US20230297715A1 — PENDING US patent application Europe EP4195140A1 / EP4195140A4 — PENDING European patent application What does the international filing tell us? This is significant because Jasmy did not limit this particular invention to Japan. It sought protection in several major markets. As of this review, the picture is: Japan — granted Taiwan — granted United States — pending Europe — pending That is much more meaningful than simply saying that Jasmy “has an international patent”. It has an international patent family with different legal statuses in different jurisdictions. JASMY PATENT 3 Device-specific cryptographic keys for blockchain recording Patent: JP7250288B2 Application publication: JP2022039713A Applicant / owner: Jasmy Incorporated Priority: 28 August 2020 Japan status: GRANTED View JP7250288B2 patent record What problem is it trying to solve? Blockchain systems depend heavily on cryptographic keys. If the same fundamental key is repeatedly exposed or used everywhere, it creates security and management problems. Jasmy's invention starts with a first key stored on the device. The device can use that key, together with other information, to create a second key. The second key can then be used when encrypted transaction information is recorded on a blockchain. Why is that useful? It creates the possibility of generating different cryptographic identities or credentials for different purposes without continually exposing the underlying master credential. The patent also describes applications in which different software can be associated with different derived keys. Example Think of the first key as the master key to a secure building. Instead of handing the master key to every room, the system creates different access cards for different rooms. The master key remains protected. What could it be used for? Potential applications include: secure PCs enterprise devices blockchain logging software-specific blockchain records device authentication IoT equipment auditable enterprise systems This is one of the patents that makes Jasmy's blockchain work particularly relevant to real devices, rather than blockchain existing only as a financial ledger. JASMY PATENT 4 Software-specific encrypted blockchain recording Patent: JP7719450B2Publication: JP2022120111AApplicant / owner: Jasmy IncorporatedPriority: 28 August 2020Japan status: GRANTEDGranted: August 2025 View JP7719450B2 patent record Is this the same patent as JP7250288? No. It belongs to the same underlying family, but JP7719450 resulted from a divisional application. That means parts of the original invention were separated and pursued through another patent application. What does this patent concentrate on? This patent goes more deeply into how a device can: hold a first key create multiple secondary keys associate those keys with particular software encrypt information generated by particular software record that encrypted information on blockchain Why does that matter? A business computer can run many different applications. Those applications do not necessarily need to share one blockchain identity. This architecture potentially allows: Application A → Key A → blockchain record Application B → Key B → blockchain record while both ultimately derive their security from the protected device-level credential. Example Instead of every employee in a building using the same security pass, each department receives a different pass derived from the building's central security system. A compromise in one area therefore does not necessarily expose everything else. Potential relevance This is particularly interesting in relation to: Jasmy Secure PC enterprise audit trails controlled software environments IoT devices software access management blockchain-based activity records Unlike Jasmy's personal-information patent family, the available family record for this invention currently shows Japan only. JASMY PATENT 5 Dialogue-based identity verification Patent: JP7116766B2 Publication: JP2022065915A Title: Discrimination System, Discrimination Method and Computer Program Owners: Jasmy Incorporated and VITS Inc. Priority: 16 October 2020J apan status: GRANTED View JP7116766B2 patent record What problem does this patent solve? Passwords and static security questions have an obvious weakness. Someone who steals the answer may be able to impersonate the legitimate user. This invention takes a different approach. How does it work? The system examines a user's previous dialogue history with an agent. It generates questions according to defined rules. The person attempting to authenticate is then asked those questions. The system evaluates whether the answers match what would be expected from the genuine user. Example Instead of asking: “What is your mother's maiden name?” the system could effectively ask something derived from your previous interactions that a stranger would be much less likely to know. Why is that useful? It introduces a more contextual form of identity verification. Potential applications could include: account recovery conversational AI authentication fraud prevention secure personal-data access user verification Important ownership point This is not solely a Jasmy patent. It is jointly associated with Jasmy and VITS. That matters when assessing Jasmy's intellectual-property portfolio. JASMY PATENT 6 Biometric-derived password generation Patent: JP7612170B1 Applicant / owner: Jasmy Incorporated Priority: 30 June 2023 Japan status: GRANTED Granted: January 2025 View JP7612170B1 patent record What problem does it solve? Modern phones already use fingerprints or facial recognition. But in many systems, biometrics simply unlock a password that has already been stored somewhere. Jasmy's invention takes a different approach. What does it do? The system obtains biometric information from the user. That information is used to create seed-key information. The system also obtains information relating to the destination or service being accessed. It then combines those pieces of information to generate a password. Example Your biometric characteristic helps create a secret ingredient. The system then combines that ingredient with information about the particular service you want to access. The resulting password can therefore be specific to that service. Why is that potentially useful? It could reduce dependence on: remembered passwords reused passwords centrally stored password lists Potential applications include: Personal Data Locker access Secure PC enterprise authentication digital identity wallets device security passwordless or semi-passwordless access JASMY PATENT 7 Extended biometric password generation Application: JP2025032352A Application number: JP2024220440A Applicant: Jasmy Incorporated Priority: 30 June 2023J apan status: PENDING Published: 11 March 2025 View JP2025032352A patent application How is this different from the granted biometric patent? This is a divisional application from the same biometric-password family. It therefore deserves to be identified separately rather than being hidden under the granted patent. What additional ideas does it cover? The application describes storing corresponding biometric information and potentially dummy biometric information. The system can select the appropriate biometric information and use it with access information to generate a password. Why introduce dummy biometric information? The underlying objective is stronger security. If sensitive biometric-derived information is stored in a structure containing other information, it can potentially make it more difficult for an attacker simply to identify and extract the meaningful credential. Current international position The patent-family records reviewed here currently identify this biometric family in Japan. I have not found a published US, European or PCT equivalent for this family in the records reviewed. JASMY PATENT 8 AC/DC power conversion and distributed power system International publication: WO2026028636A1 Application: PCT/JP2025/021872 Applicant: Jasmy Incorporated Priority: 29 July 2024 Filed: 18 June 2025 Published: 5 February 2026 Status: PENDING INTERNATIONAL PCT APPLICATION View WO2026028636A1 patent application Why is this patent surprising? Because it is not primarily about personal data. It is about electricity. The invention covers an AC/DC power-conversion device using an inverter, battery and multiple current sensors. What problem is it trying to solve? Electrical loads can change extremely quickly. Traditional power sources do not always respond instantly enough to those fluctuations. The invention aims to control current rapidly so that fluctuations on the load side can be absorbed or managed using the inverter and battery system. What does the device contain? At a simplified level: a connection to the main distribution line a connection to a secondary distribution line a connection to a storage battery an inverter multiple current sensors control circuitry The current sensors monitor what is happening on different sides of the system. The inverter then responds to those measurements. Example Imagine a building suddenly turning on a large amount of electrical equipment. Instead of forcing the wider grid to react instantly to that sudden demand, a local battery and inverter can respond. The battery effectively acts as a shock absorber. But there is another very interesting element The patent also describes multiple power-conversion devices exchanging electricity. Before electricity is supplied between devices, reservation information can be written to a blockchain. The actual amount supplied and consumed can then also be recorded on blockchain. That means the patent is not simply: battery + inverter. It also contemplates: distributed energy + measurement + transaction records + blockchain. Why does that matter? Potential applications include: local microgrids distributed batteries renewable-energy communities peer-to-peer electricity exchange industrial energy management auditable energy transactions smart grids International status This is currently a PCT international application. That does not mean Jasmy has already been granted patents throughout the world. As of this review, I have not identified published national grants arising from this PCT application. That is therefore one of the most important patent families to watch. 2. JASMYLAB JasmyLab was established in 2023 and operates in areas including distributed GPUs, blockchain development and Web3 infrastructure. JasmyLab official website Current patent position Japan's G-Biz corporate information system currently reports: Patents: 0 for JasmyLab Inc. View JasmyLab government patent record Does that mean JasmyLab has no intellectual property? No. That would be an incorrect conclusion. A technology company can protect intellectual property through: patents software copyright trade secrets proprietary algorithms confidential know-how trademarks licensing arrangements Patent applications can also remain unpublished for a period after filing. What can we say confidently? As of 13 September 2026: I have not identified a published patent application or granted patent directly assigned to JasmyLab Inc. That is different from saying JasmyLab has never filed one. 3. JANCTION JANCTION is a service/project operated by JasmyLab rather than a separate patent-owning corporation. JANCTION company information Its technology currently includes: distributed GPU infrastructure GPU Pool blockchain infrastructure workload scheduling secure execution verification infrastructure Smart Render digital-asset infrastructure Does JANCTION itself own patents? I have not identified a published patent naming #JANCTION as the legal applicant or patent owner. That distinction matters because JANCTION is a brand/project operated by JasmyLab. What about claims that JANCTION uses patented technology? JasmyLab's own material has referred to patented technologies in connection with its business. However, that statement does not by itself identify: the patent number the patent owner whether JasmyLab owns it whether it is licensed whether it belongs to a partner Until a specific patent record is identified, it would be unsafe to label an unidentified patent as a “JANCTION patent”. SMART RENDER BY JANCTION Smart Render is particularly relevant because it combines technology and expertise from JasmyLab, Jasmy and Panasonic Advanced Technology. Panasonic Advanced Technology Smart Render announcement Patent status The August 2026 announcement states that: Smart Render by JANCTION is the subject of a trademark registration application. That is a trademark, not a patent. A trademark protects branding. A patent protects an invention. The two should not be confused. Why could Smart Render eventually become patent-relevant? Its technical architecture includes: distributed GPU allocation parallel rendering secure data transfer controlled execution environments Jasmy PDL integration Some of those implementation methods could potentially produce patentable inventions. But unless and until an application is published, that remains speculation. 4. REMIXPOINT Remixpoint has a longer patent history. Its intellectual-property record reflects the company's evolution through software, image processing, industrial inspection, digital platforms and now energy. Remixpoint official corporate site REMIXPOINT PATENT 1 Wholesale electricity trading and battery-control system Patent: JP7897821 Application: JP2023-087749 Publication: JP2024-170957 Owners: Remixpoint Inc. and BlueMaus Technology Filed: 29 May 2023 Japan status: GRANTED View JP7897821 patent record What problem does it solve? Battery storage is useful, but simply owning a battery does not automatically make it economically efficient. Electricity prices change throughout the day. A smarter system needs to determine: When should we buy electricity? When should we store it? When should we discharge it? What does the patent do? The system obtains next-day wholesale electricity-market prices. It calculates thresholds from those prices. When electricity is relatively cheap, it can schedule charging. When electricity becomes relatively expensive, it can schedule discharging. But it does not blindly follow the schedule. It can also consider: battery condition electricity demand changes in demand connected loads Example Think of it as an automated energy trader attached to a large battery. Cheap electricity → buy and store Expensive electricity → discharge But if the battery or building suddenly needs something different, the system can override the original schedule. Why is this strategically important? It turns a battery from passive hardware into an actively managed economic asset. That is directly relevant to Remixpoint's current expansion into: grid batteries energy management electricity trading battery optimisation REMIXPOINT PATENT APPLICATION 2 Social-media-assisted marketplace screening Application: JP2021-199703 Publication: JP2023-085591 Applicant: Remixpoint Inc. Status: PUBLISHED APPLICATION View JP2023-085591 record What problem does it solve? Online marketplaces face the problem of inappropriate or unsuitable products being listed. Traditional screening can rely entirely on the marketplace operator. This invention introduces community feedback. How does it work? A seller submits information about an item. The system facilitates a social-media post concerning the proposed item. It then obtains information representing social-media users' evaluations of that item. That information can be used to determine whether the listing is appropriate. Example Before allowing something into an online marketplace, the system effectively asks: “How is the wider community reacting to this item?” That feedback becomes another input into the listing decision. Why is it relevant? This reflects Remixpoint's earlier digital-platform activities rather than its present energy focus. It nevertheless shows a recurring interest in: data → automated evaluation → decision-making. REMIXPOINT PATENT 3 Interactive image optimisation Patent: JP4851251 Application: JP2006-183883 Owners: Remixpoint and Oita University Japan status: GRANTED / HISTORICAL View JP4851251 patent record What problem does it solve? Image-editing software can have huge numbers of possible parameter combinations. A normal user may not know which settings will produce the best-looking result. What does the invention do? The system generates several candidate versions of an image. The user selects the preferred version. The computer then uses that choice to narrow the possible parameter space and generates another set of candidates. The process can continue iteratively. Example The computer says: “Which of these pictures looks best?” You choose one. The computer learns the direction you prefer and produces better-targeted alternatives. Why is it interesting today? The patent predates today's generative-AI boom, but the basic principle is recognisable: machine generates options → human supplies preference → machine refines output. It is a historical Remixpoint patent, not evidence that Remixpoint currently operates an AI image-generation business. REMIXPOINT PATENT 4 Drill-wear inspection Patent: JP4128613 Owners: Remixpoint and Ritsumeikan University Japan status: GRANTED / HISTORICAL View JP4128613 patent record What problem does it solve? Factories need to know when cutting tools have worn sufficiently to require regrinding or replacement. Human judgement can vary. What does the system do? It captures an image of a drill tip. The shape of the cutting edge is measured. The system compares the result with reference information representing: an unused drill a drill that should be considered worn out It then mathematically estimates the degree of wear. Example Instead of a worker looking at a drill and saying: “That looks worn.” the computer measures the image and estimates objectively how far the drill has progressed from new to worn out. Why is it relevant? It demonstrates Remixpoint's earlier involvement in: • computer vision industrial automation• objective machine-condition assessment REMIXPOINT PATENT FAMILY 5 Drill inspection method and program This earlier drill-inspection work also produced additional rights. Known records include: JP4077025 — Japan — granted JP4024832 — Japan divisional — granted KR10-0899259 — South Korea — granted CN101368820B — China — granted historically View Chinese patent-family record What does this family do? The broader family addresses automated inspection of drill cutting edges and determining tool wear using image analysis. Why are there several patent numbers? Because one invention can produce: an original application divisional applications separate national applications These should not be interpreted as completely unrelated inventions simply because the patent numbers differ. International significance Unlike many of #Remixpoint's historical patents, this technology was pursued outside Japan. That shows that Remixpoint and its research partner considered the industrial inspection technology sufficiently valuable to seek broader protection. REMIXPOINT PATENT 6 Image analysis, registration and search Patent: JP4228031 Owners / research connection: Remixpoint and Ritsumeikan University-related research Japan status: GRANTED / HISTORICAL What problem does it solve? Computers need a mathematical way of understanding whether images are similar. Simply comparing pixels is often not enough. What does the technology do? It extracts features from images and uses mathematical transformations to create a space in which different image classes can be distinguished more effectively. Example Instead of teaching a computer: “These exact pixels mean a dog.” the system tries to identify the deeper characteristics that make one class of images different from another. Why is it important? This was essentially machine-learning-style image classification and retrieval work before today's AI terminology became commonplace. It demonstrates that Remixpoint's historical technology portfolio was significantly more technical than its present energy-focused public identity might suggest. REMIXPOINT PATENT APPLICATION 7 Image analysis and image-search improvement Application: JP2008-151090 Publication: JP2009-295130 Applicants: Remixpoint and Ritsumeikan University Status: HISTORICAL PUBLISHED APPLICATION View JP2009-295130 record What problem does it solve? Searching images effectively requires the computer to identify the characteristics that actually distinguish one type of image from another. What does it do? The system: extracts features from multiple images obtains known class information creates mathematical weighting maps the features into a higher-dimensional space identifies a subspace useful for distinguishing image classes Example Imagine giving a computer thousands of photographs and telling it which categories they belong to. The system tries to discover which combinations of characteristics are most useful for telling those categories apart. Why is it relevant? Again, this belongs to Remixpoint's historical image-analysis era. But it provides useful context for understanding that Remixpoint's technical background predates its energy and digital-asset businesses. 5. DEEPPOINT #DEEPPOINT requires an important clarification. DEEPPOINT official site DEEPPOINT is not a separate DeepTech company with Tadashi Morita's patents sitting inside it. It is a DeepTech media and growth-platform initiative operated by Remixpoint. It covers fields including: AI semiconductors quantum technology space fusion robotics next-generation energy Does DEEPPOINT own Tadashi Morita's patents? No evidence supports that conclusion. DEEPPOINT has interviewed and featured Morita and describes his extensive invention history. That does not transfer ownership of those patents to DEEPPOINT. What about “D. DEEPPOINT”? A 2026 Korean intellectual-property record exists for D. DEEPPOINT. However, that record is a trademark-class registration, not evidence of a DEEPPOINT technology patent. Again: brand protection ≠ invention patent. Current conclusion I have not identified a published technology patent directly assigned to DEEPPOINT itself. Its significance is currently as a platform connecting: technology + inventors + companies + investors + commercialisation. 6. OTHER PATENTS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS NETWORK This section needs to be handled carefully. Tadashi Morita is described by DEEPPOINT as having produced approximately 110 patents during his career. Those patents do not belong to #Jasmy simply because #Morita now works with Jasmy. Many were created during his career at #Sony. Rather than misrepresenting all 110 as “Jasmy-related patents”, the most relevant foundational examples are listed below. RELATED PATENT 1 Contactless communication and secure information processing Patent: US8605903B2 Inventors: Tadashi Morita and Toshinori Kanemoto Owner: Sony Corporation Status: GRANTED / HISTORICAL SONY PATENT View US8605903B2 patent record What does it do? The invention concerns wireless communication and the processing of information associated with contactless IC cards. Why is it relevant? Morita's later work at Jasmy focuses heavily on security, devices and identity. This earlier work shows that his experience in secure digital interaction did not begin with blockchain. It developed through decades of work involving contactless systems. RELATED PATENT 2 Near-field communication with external devices Patent: US8086176B2 Inventors: #KatsuyukiTeruyama and #TadashiMorita Owner: Sony Corporation Status: GRANTED HISTORICALLY; US RECORD LATER EXPIRED FOR NON-PAYMENT View US8086176B2 patent record What problem does it address? Modern devices can contain multiple secure components that need to communicate through one NFC interface. The system needs to coordinate those components efficiently. What does it do? It manages near-field communication between a device and external equipment and coordinates how different internal elements gain access to the communications interface. Why does it matter? This is relevant to the technological lineage behind: smartphones NFC digital credentials secure elements contactless authentication It is not a Jasmy patent, but it helps explain #Morita's technical background. RELATED PATENT 3 Continuation of NFC communication architecture Patent: US8213860B2 Inventors: Katsuyuki Teruyama and Tadashi Morita Owner: Sony Corporation Status: HISTORICAL / EXPIRED View US8213860B2 patent record What does it do? This patent continues the architecture for managing near-field communication between multiple processing elements and an external device. Why is it separately listed? Because it became a separate granted US patent. It should not simply be hidden behind the earlier patent number. The family demonstrates sustained development around secure-element and NFC communications. RELATED PATENT 4 Further continuation of NFC secure-element communications Patent: US8311479B2 Inventors: Katsuyuki Teruyama and Tadashi Morita Owner: Sony Corporation Status: HISTORICAL / EXPIRED View US8311479B2 patent record What does it do? This continuation focuses on coordinating multiple independent processing elements sharing a near-field communications interface. Different communication time slots can be allocated to the different elements. Example Imagine several secure applications inside one phone all wanting to use the same NFC antenna. The system acts like a traffic controller deciding who gets access and when. Why is that relevant today? Digital identity increasingly depends on exactly this type of architecture: secure credential + device + communications interface + controlled access. RELATED PATENT 5 Contactless card information-processing system Patent: US7886981B2 Inventor: Tadashi Morita Owner: Sony Corporation Status: HISTORICAL View US7886981B2 patent family record What does it do? This invention concerns information-processing systems involving readers, writers and contactless cards. Why does it matter? Again, the relevance is not ownership. The relevance is technical continuity. Morita's career repeatedly touches the same broad problem: How do people, devices and systems exchange information securely without creating unnecessary friction? #Jasmy approaches that problem today using: blockchain biometrics Personal Data Locker cryptographic keys His earlier Sony work approached it through: IC cards NFC secure elements contactless communications RELATED PATENT 6 Anti-skimming contactless card notification Publication: JP2007200231A Inventor: Tadashi Morita Applicant: Sony Corporation Status: HISTORICAL PATENT APPLICATION View JP2007200231A record What problem does it solve? Contactless cards can potentially be read without the owner fully realising that communication is occurring. That creates a skimming risk. What does it do? The invention is designed to notify the user when equipment is attempting to access, or is accessing, a contactless information card. Example Instead of a contactless credential being silently read, the user receives an indication that communication is taking place. Why is it interesting? The philosophy is strikingly consistent with Jasmy's later data-sovereignty message: the user should know when their information is being accessed. That does not make this a Jasmy patent. But it does show continuity in Morita's approach to security and user control. THE MOST INTERESTING CROSSOVER: JASMY + REMIXPOINT + ENERGY The most interesting overlap in the current patent landscape is not crypto. It is electricity. Jasmy now has: WO2026028636A1: AC/DC power conversion device and power system — PENDING Remixpoint now has: JP7897821: wholesale electricity trading and battery-control system — GRANTED These patents solve different problems. Jasmy's layer Jasmy's invention is concerned primarily with: power conversion current control batteries distributed electrical systems recording planned and actual electricity transfers on blockchain Remixpoint's layer Remixpoint's invention is concerned primarily with: electricity-market prices deciding when batteries should charge deciding when batteries should discharge demand conditions economic optimisation Put very simply: #Jasmy patent: How can electricity technically move and be controlled? #Remixpoint patent: When is it economically sensible to store or release that electricity? That does not prove the companies are jointly developing a secret energy product. But the technological complementarity is real enough to justify watching. WHAT ABOUT JASMYLAB + JANCTION + JASMY'S PATENTS? Another potential convergence is developing around computing. JasmyLab describes JANCTION as distributed infrastructure connecting idle GPUs with users requiring computing resources. Its architecture includes: job splitting GPU selection execution monitoring settlement secure data transfer isolated runtime environments audit logs #Jasmy, meanwhile, already holds patents relating to: device-level cryptographic keys software-specific blockchain recording controlled personal-data disclosure biometric authentication That creates an obvious technical question: Could #Jasmy's identity, device-security and data-control patents eventually be applied to #JANCTION's distributed-computing environment? Technically, there are areas of compatibility. But I have not found a published patent proving that this integration has itself been patented. That distinction is important. CURRENT PATENT SNAPSHOT JASMY JP7116766B2 — GRANTEDDialogue-based identity verification. JP7250288B2 — GRANTEDDevice-derived cryptographic keys and blockchain recording. JP7313642B2 — GRANTEDControlled sharing of personal information. TWI880013B — GRANTEDTaiwanese member of Jasmy's personal-information patent family. US20230297715A1 — PENDINGUS member of personal-information family. EP4195140A1/A4 — PENDINGEuropean member of personal-information family. JP2023126889A — PENDINGEncrypted sharing of more identifying personal information. JP7612170B1 — GRANTEDBiometric-derived password generation. JP2025032352A — PENDINGDivisional biometric password application. JP7719450B2 — GRANTEDSoftware-specific cryptographic keys and blockchain recording. WO2026028636A1 — PENDING PCTAC/DC power conversion, batteries, distributed electricity and blockchain records. JASMYLAB No published patent directly assigned to JasmyLab identified in this review. Japanese government corporate patent data currently reports 0. JANCTION No published patent directly assigned to JANCTION identified. JANCTION is operated by JasmyLab. Smart Render is currently identified as having a trademark application, not a patent application. REMIXPOINT JP7897821 — GRANTEDWholesale electricity trading and battery optimisation. JP2023-085591 — PUBLISHED APPLICATIONSocial-media-assisted marketplace listing evaluation. JP4851251 — GRANTED / HISTORICALInteractive image optimisation. JP4128613 — GRANTED / HISTORICALDrill wear inspection. JP4077025 — GRANTED / HISTORICALDrill inspection family. JP4024832 — GRANTED / HISTORICAL DIVISIONALDrill inspection family. KR10-0899259 — GRANTED / HISTORICALKorean drill-inspection family member. CN101368820B — GRANTED / HISTORICALChinese drill-inspection family member. JP4228031 — GRANTED / HISTORICALImage analysis, registration and search. JP2009-295130 — HISTORICAL PUBLISHED APPLICATIONImage analysis and search technology. DEEPPOINT No technology patent directly assigned to DEEPPOINT identified. DEEPPOINT is operated by Remixpoint. Its role is currently better described as a DeepTech media and commercialisation platform. WHAT SHOULD WE WATCH NEXT? The patent story is still developing. The most important things to monitor are: whether Jasmy's US personal-information application is granted whether Jasmy's European application is granted whether additional countries enter or grant Jasmy patent families whether JP2023126889A is granted whether JP2025032352A is granted which countries Jasmy ultimately pursues from WO2026028636A1 whether the energy patent produces Japanese, US, European or Asian national-phase patents whether JasmyLab publishes its first patent application whether JANCTION's GPU scheduling, verification or secure-compute technology becomes patented whether Smart Render generates technical patent applications beyond its trademark whether Remixpoint files further battery, aggregation or electricity-market patents whether Jasmy's identity/security technology is formally integrated into JANCTION whether Jasmy's power-system technology becomes commercially connected with Remixpoint's energy business FINAL TAKEAWAY The patents do not prove that #Jasmy, #JasmyLab, #JANCTION, #Remixpoint and #DEEPPOINT are secretly parts of one patented master system. The evidence does not support making that claim. What the records do reveal is a surprisingly broad and increasingly complementary technology landscape. Jasmy has protected inventions covering personal information, blockchain recording, cryptographic keys, identity verification, biometric authentication and now distributed electricity systems. JasmyLab is building distributed GPU and blockchain infrastructure, although no published patent directly assigned to JasmyLab has yet been identified. JANCTION is turning that infrastructure into distributed computing, rendering and digital-asset services, but should not yet be described as owning patents unless specific patent records can be identified. Remixpoint has a genuine historical technology portfolio covering image processing and industrial computer vision and now has a highly relevant modern patent covering automated electricity-market and battery management. DEEPPOINT is not itself the owner of Tadashi Morita's historical patents. It is a Remixpoint-operated DeepTech platform that is now bringing together technologies, inventors, companies and potential commercial applications. And Tadashi Morita's earlier Sony patents provide an important piece of context. His work on secure elements, NFC and contactless information systems predates Jasmy by many years. Today, his Jasmy inventions extend into biometrics, cryptographic authentication and power systems. The common thread is not simply cryptocurrency. It is the engineering of systems in which: people, devices, data, computing resources and now electricity can interact securely while control and verification remain measurable. That is why these patents are worth watching. They give us something far more useful than speculation: a documented trail of the technologies these companies and inventors have actually considered important enough to protect. I look forward to extrapolating the detail from these patents even further so we can make REAL decisions about the value of #Jasmy and #Janction.

Looking at what is happening in Japan right now, several national trends line up unusually well with technologies Jasmy/JasmyLab/JANCTION have been developing. The important distinction is that most are market-direction signals, not evidence Jasmy has won the contracts. Image 1. Japan's national trends line up unusually well with the technologies Jasmy/JasmyLab/JANCTION have been developing 1. Japan is turning electricity + GPUs into one infrastructure problem This is probably the strongest external trend for JANCTION. Japan's current “Watt-Bit” push is explicitly about coordinating computing workloads with available electricity. A NEDO-backed project involving IIJ, TEPCO Power Grid, Chubu Electric Power Grid, Fujitsu and others is operating geographically distributed GPU servers as a single AI processing environment. The experiment runs from August 2026 to March 2027 and tests shifting GPU workloads according to electricity conditions. (インターネットイニシアティブ-IIJ) J-POWER, Hitachi, Cisco and railway companies are separately working on linking regional AI data centres over optical networks and moving computing workloads geographically to improve utilisation of both computing and electricity infrastructure. (J-Power) That's remarkably close to JANCTION's underlying proposition: distributed GPUs → orchestration → workloads allocated across resources → compute sold as a service. It doesn't establish a JANCTION relationship. But Japan is effectively validating the problem JANCTION was designed to solve. 2. AI computation is moving away from one giant data centre NTT and DOCOMO have demonstrated AI inference using remotely distributed GPUs, connected through their optical network, including applications involving robotics. (NTT) That matters because JANCTION becomes potentially more valuable if the future architecture is: many GPU locations → one accessible compute layer rather than: one enormous GPU facility → users connect directly to it. And Jasmy has already moved beyond theory here: Jasmy, JasmyLab and Panasonic Advanced Technology announced Smart Render on 31 August, using distributed GPUs for rendering; their test reported a roughly 94% reduction in rendering time for the cited workload. (Jasmy) This is one of the strongest areas where Japan's direction and #JANCTION's actual product direction intersect. 3. Japan's yen stablecoin market is becoming real This has changed substantially. On 7 September, SBI announced that its trust-based yen stablecoin JPYSC had approximately ¥20.1 billion outstanding. Under regulatory changes effective 1 June 2026, qualifying trust-based stablecoins can also invest part of their backing assets in short-dated Japanese government securities and term deposits. (SBI Group) So Japan is moving beyond “maybe we'll have regulated yen stablecoins” into an environment where regulated on-chain yen exists at meaningful scale. That could matter enormously for Jasmy's future architecture. A Jasmy service doesn't necessarily need customers to purchase volatile JASMY to pay ¥5,000 for something. Conceptually it could become: customer → yen stablecoin → application/paymentJasmyChain → transaction executionJASMY → network gas That would give JASMY a completely different role from the stablecoin. I would therefore watch JPYD/JasmyChain developments extremely closely. 4. Japan is moving securities and government bonds on-chain This is much bigger than crypto speculation. Japan is studying blockchain infrastructure capable of near-instant settlement of stocks and Japanese government bonds. The FSA, Ministry of Finance, Bank of Japan and financial institutions are involved, with a development plan reportedly targeted around early 2027. (Reuters) Meanwhile, Progmat has already announced a proof of concept for on-chain JGB repo transactions, following work specifically examining tokenised JGB repo transactions using stablecoins. (Progmat) And the Bank of Japan is exploring tokenised central-bank deposits/wholesale CBDC using DLT, including delivery-versus-payment settlement of digital assets. (Bank of Japan) This doesn't mean JasmyChain will become Japan's financial settlement chain. But it means that concepts such as: blockchain + identity + assets + stable money + settlement are moving into mainstream Japanese financial infrastructure. That makes Jasmy's repeated work around identity, data rights, blockchain and settlement much more strategically relevant than it appeared several years ago. 5. Digital identity is becoming infrastructure, not an ID card This one could be extremely important for Jasmy. Japan's JPKI infrastructure is now used by 1,307 private-sector companies as of 17 August 2026, including for opening bank/securities accounts and loan contracts. (デジタル庁) The My Number Card is also now available on iPhone, further moving government-backed identity into everyday digital services. (デジタル庁) Jasmy is particularly relevant here because its own site notes that its case study was included in the Digital Agency's My Number Card Info material, and its Panasonic Advanced Technology work has already incorporated identity/data-management functionality. (Jasmy) This creates a potentially important future stack: JPKI/My Number → verified personPDL → user-controlled informationJasmy applications → permission/use of that informationJasmyChain → verifiable transactions/rightsstablecoin → monetary settlement Again, we don't yet have evidence that the Japanese government has selected that complete Jasmy architecture. But the individual problems it addresses are converging. 6. Japan's national digital strategy is moving toward AI + identity + infrastructure together Japan's Cabinet approved its latest Priority Plan for the Advancement of a Digital Society on 21 July 2026. Among its priorities are integrated AI utilisation, government DX, local-government infrastructure and citizen/business digital services. (デジタル庁) That matters because Jasmy is no longer pursuing just one technology. What we're now looking at is roughly: Jasmy — PDL / identity / IoT / enterprise data↓Panasonic Advanced Technology — IoT + enterprise technology↓JasmyLab — applications/development↓JANCTION — distributed GPU/AI compute↓Smart Render — commercial use of distributed GPUs↓JasmyChain — blockchain execution↓JASMY — gas↓Digital Asset — creator/digital asset infrastructure↓potential stablecoin settlement layer And outside Jasmy, Japan is simultaneously building: digital identity + distributed GPUs + energy-aware computing + regulated stablecoins + tokenised assets + blockchain settlement. The one connection I'm keen to investigate more deeply It's actually energy × GPU × blockchain, especially given the Jasmy power-system PCT application we were discussing. Japan is actively experimenting with treating GPU electricity consumption as something that can be controlled according to grid conditions. (インターネットイニシアティブ-IIJ) JANCTION is building distributed GPU orchestration. And Jasmy has separately filed IP involving power-management technology and blockchain. Those facts do not establish that the patent is for JANCTION. But if Jasmy/JasmyLab eventually combined: distributed GPU orchestration → electricity-aware workload allocation → metered consumption → blockchain record → automated settlement then several things that currently look like separate Jasmy projects would suddenly make considerably more sense. That's the area I will watch most closely over the next 6–12 months. The Japanese market is moving toward precisely that convergence. #Jasmy #Janction #@HARA_JasmyCFO #@v01d_official